OK, but those gases haven't been declining for the last 11 year, yet temperatures have declined.
--- On Mon, 12/14/09, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OT] Re: In Bangladesh, climate change is a matter of life and > death > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, December 14, 2009, 3:35 PM > Who said that it was only CO2? The > gases on the full list are methane, > nitrous oxide, ozone, and chlorofluorocarbons. In addition > to the effect of > these gases is deforestation which is also a major factor > in planet warming. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Madigan" <[email protected]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 1:51 PM > Subject: Re: [OT] Re: In Bangladesh,climate change is a > matter of life and > death > > > The fact that the Earth has been cooling since 1998 cannot > be explained by > the lowering of CO2 so it has to be something other than > CO2 > > --- On Mon, 12/14/09, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [OT] Re: In Bangladesh, climate change is > a matter of life > > and death > > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > > Date: Monday, December 14, 2009, 12:08 PM > > I fail to see how 4 billion years > > relate to recent events. Where do you > > think the sea water is coming from that is rising in > > Bangladesh? Delivered > > by comets or coming from melting glaciers? > > > > The ice in the Arctic is melting at a furious rate. > The > > Northwest Passage is > > opening wider and sooner every year. The people who > cannot > > see this > > happening should be arrested for stupidity. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Madigan" <[email protected]> > > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:28 AM > > Subject: Re: [OT] Re: In Bangladesh,climate change is > a > > matter of life and > > death > > > > > > Nick, > > > > Temperatures have been recorded accurately since > about > > 1850, so we have > > about 160 years of data. > > > > The Earth is about 4 billion years > > old. That means we are only looking at > > a tiny slice of time. There is no way to predict the > > future based on real > > temperature readings of only 160 years of a 4 billion > year > > old planet. > > > > This is like predicting the future of the stock > market > > using the last 1 > > second of data. > > > > These people who are perpetrating this hoax should be > > arrested for fraud > > > > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
