Here are the facts. Many different things are pointing to 2012 as the end of times, including some interpretations of the Mayan calendar.
Saint Malachy's Prophecy of the Popes suggests that there will only be one other Pope after Benedict. Benedict is 83 so how much time does he have? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy_of_the_Popes Obama meets about 1/2 of the requirements of the Antichrist according to scripture, so far. --- On Fri, 2/5/10, Publius Maximus <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Publius Maximus <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OT] No, he can't > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 7:22 PM > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:39 PM, > Michael Madigan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It's time for him to open the concentration camps and > round up the small business owners. > > > > I don't have any doubt in my mind, nor any contradiction > from my > spirit, that Obama is Very Bad News for the republic. > Indeed, I > grieved over it for some time even before he was elected, > when it was > obvious he was going to win. But, I don't feel in my gut > that he's > vaguely competent enough to pull that off. At least, not > based on the > last year. A great orator... who needs teleprompters at an > elementary > school press conference? A leader who can't get a bill > passed through > a Congress dominated by a super-majority from his own > party? > > If my preterist views are wrong and there is a > once-and-future > Anti-Christ (capital A, capital C), Obama's just not > fitting the > profile. I mean, Satan is nothing if not competent at what > he does... > Obama's a clown, whose "don't blame me, everything was > broken when I > walked in the door" shtick has long run dry. > > Which is why my major focus of concern has been the people > around him, > whom we do not know. He's probably just a shill for > someone/something > much worse. He's already loaded his Czardom with enough > Maoists to > spook anyone vaguely acquainted with the history of the > "progressive" > holocausts of the 21st century. > > What lurks behind them and in these multi-thousand-page > tomes of > who-knows-what they're churning out in all these bills is > where I > think we're in trouble, if any of it gets passed. > > And then there is the debt, which, seriously, astounds even > me. I > mean, if the trajectory was at least somewhat linear and > not so > exponential as to resemble the tallest looping roller > coaster in the > universe, the guy would have a bit more credibility in his > scathing > critique of his predecessor. But instead, this doofus has > the gall to > chide "Washington" for too much spending even as he himself > proposes a > deficit the size of some black hole in outer space in a > budget bigger > than any 1 year expenditure in the history of human > civilization. > > Go figure. > > - Publius > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 2/5/10, Publius Maximus <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> From: Publius Maximus <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [OT] No, he can't > >> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > >> Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 6:12 PM > >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:31 PM, > >> Michael Madigan <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > This retard (borrowing a phrase from Rahm) > only had to > >> compromise a little bit on his plan > >> > >> BTW, the dirty little secret laid bare by how this > all > >> unfolded was > >> that he never had a *plan* per se... all he had > was > >> Chavez-type > >> ambition and an ego the size of the sun. > >> > >> Like the Joker, he was a dog chasing a car, not > sure what > >> he'd do if > >> he ever caught it. > >> > >> Give the public's rejection of his "plans" time to > sink in. > >> He'll > >> morph into something even worse, unless by the > grace of God > >> is granted > >> an ounce of love or appreciation for the country > he > >> loathes, that gave > >> him all this power on the promise of a hope. > >> > >> I'm not holding by breath, but God is good, and > >> all-powerful. For some > >> reason, he allowed this. What went around when > the > >> Democrats -- > >> especially Obama -- were trashing Bush has come > around to > >> crush the > >> myth of Obama's "exceptionalism". > >> > >> Maybe now the focus can turn back to America's > future > >> instead of this > >> or that political soap opera de jure. > >> > >> - Publius > >> > >> > and he would have peeled off 10 Republicans > to vote > >> yes, but his narcissism > >> > prevented him from doing it. Chump. > >> > > >> > --- On Fri, 2/5/10, Publius Maximus <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> From: Publius Maximus <[email protected]> > >> >> Subject: [OT] No, he can't > >> >> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > >> >> Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 5:08 PM > >> >> http://bit.ly/bO3NaP > >> >> > >> >> - - - > >> >> WASHINGTON – No, maybe he can't. > President > >> Barack Obama, > >> >> who insisted > >> >> he would succeed where other presidents > had failed > >> to fix > >> >> the nation's > >> >> health care system, now concedes the > effort may > >> die in > >> >> Congress. > >> >> > >> >> The president's newly conflicting signals > could > >> frustrate > >> >> Democratic > >> >> lawmakers who are hungry for guidance > from the > >> White House > >> >> as they try > >> >> to salvage the effort to extend coverage > to > >> millions of > >> >> uninsured > >> >> Americans and hold down spiraling medical > costs. > >> Obama's > >> >> comments > >> >> Thursday night came hours after > Republican Scott > >> Brown was > >> >> sworn in to > >> >> replace the late Edward M. Kennedy, > leaving > >> Democrats > >> >> without their > >> >> filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, > and > >> Obama's > >> >> signature health > >> >> legislation with no clear path forward. > >> >> - - - > >> >> > >> >> And he had one of the largest > Congressional > >> majorities in > >> >> history on > >> >> his side, to boot. > >> >> > >> >> Maybe experience and character do > matter. > >> >> > >> >> - Publius > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> > >> >> "It ought never to be forgotten, that a > firm union > >> of this > >> >> country, > >> >> under an efficient government, will > probably be > >> an > >> >> increasing object > >> >> of jealousy to more than one nation of > Europe; and > >> that > >> >> enterprises to > >> >> subvert it will sometimes originate in > the > >> intrigues of > >> >> foreign > >> >> powers, and will seldom fail to be > patronized and > >> abetted > >> >> by some of > >> >> them. Its preservation, therefore ought > in no case > >> that can > >> >> be > >> >> avoided, to be committed to the > guardianship of > >> any but > >> >> those whose > >> >> situation will uniformly beget an > immediate > >> interest in the > >> >> faithful > >> >> and vigilant performance of the trust." > >> [Federalist Papers > >> >> #59] > [excessive quoting removed by server] > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
