John, congrats!  I guess I am supportive of the technology and how it is
being used, mostly because I have nothing to hide from any law enforcement
agency (so far <g>).  I wonder how it must feel to be buzzing around with a
patrol car equipped with that unit and hearing the system firing off an
audio alert with nearly every car on the road that is being scanned.
Heh-heh.  

The reason that comes to mind is because the other year while being
"interrogated" during a jury selection process all potential jurors had to
disclose any past criminal convictions, other than parking violations.  I
was pretty surprised by the number of folks that looked perfectly normal
otherwise that stated their past misdeeds.  A lot of aggravated assault and
battery convictions, some forgery, some burglary.  I was not selected to
serve on the jury, I suppose because I had no convictions other than traffic
tickets.  I did not represent a group of peers I guess, as I had no serious
convictions <g>.

Gil


 
 
Gilbert M. Hale
[email protected]
585-359-8085 - Office (Rolls To Cellular)
585-202-4341 - Cellular/Voice Mail


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:profoxtech-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of John
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:27 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [NF] Sorta - vfp 9 app in the news
> 
> http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/dpp/news/local/030110-mpd-scanner-reads-
> plates-o
> n-the-move
> 
> John Harvey
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/04b701caba14$33dca190$9b95e4...@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to