So lets just accept 31000 as the figure as opposed to australias <100. You have TWENTY times the rate of gun deaths. That works for my argument just as well 30 times.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Tuesday, 23 March 2010 3:45 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Welcome to Deemocracy geoff wrote: > I can't have a rational debate on gun deaths if you are going to start with > a position that essentially denies that they happen. The figure of 642 is > ludicrous as everyone knows. Hi Geoff, You missed my last post, there are more, but the design of the database put them in many different tables, with no links. John Harvey just posted a figure I am sure is correct, 30,896, including homicides, accidents and suicides. John Harvey is a government source. There are not 50,000. I am searching the archives now to find the post where you say I said there were. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
