geoff wrote: > Whilst I grant my 50,000 was wrong it was a lot closer than 624!!! And > 'only' 11624 gun homicides still makes my point. That is still TEN times our > rate per head of population.
Hi Geoff, Assuming your figures are correct, seeing as you have not documented them at all, let alone to the level you require of me. Not only that, you guys have to get your manhood back where it comes to shooting *rabbits*, LOL. http://www.animalcontrol.com.au/rabbit.htm > Yes, but we aren't quite finished. You just exaggerated our gun deaths > by 19,104, how do you know that the "less than 100 in Australia" is in > any way accurate? -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
