And it's not rich at all. You have no clue where I get my information from so you can hardly be dismissive of the information, although it hardly surprises me that you would be.
::michael Bill Anderson wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Michael Oke, II <[email protected]> wrote: > >> And you know that because? Exactly, you don't. > > > Oh, that's rich. > > I've been reading about this for over 20 years. I've been in touch with some > of the people at the Rand Corporation that put out studies saying the same. > > And what are your sources? > > Bill > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
