I'd agree with you except for the fact that I provided you with details about how my information was derived. Not much I can do to provide you with the supporting info as it exists with me, and those that I spoke to. Perhaps you'd like to go and speak with them yourself?
You failing, or refusing, to provide links to, what I would suppose are public, studies, now that is a non-starter. ::michael Bill Anderson wrote: > ...coming from someone who doesn't provide any supporting information. > > That's a non-starter. > > Bill > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Michael Oke, II <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My information is first hand from discussions with people dealing >> directly with the situation at hand. Exactly what links are you >> expecting me to provide you? >> >> Excellent excuse not provide any supporting information. Lacking that >> from you, you'll have to understand why I'll just lump your >> protestations in with Jesse Jackson and Al "Tawana Brawley" Sharpton. >> >> ::michael > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
