On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Dan Covill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Aw, gee, fellers!!  <g>
> I really do appreciate the notice and good wishes.
>
> Retirement seems to be taken up with a lot of time in doctors' offices.
> I still have one client, for whom I do occasional maintenance.
>
> I have a Family Tree program I wrote for FP 2.6 and partially converted
> to VFP a couple years ago that I'm trying to finish up; that's why I'm
> back on ProFox.  Turns out that navigating a family tree involves lots
> of "which record am I on now" problems.
------------------

Sounds like a reason to use XML

<PersonOfInterest>
<Parents/>
<Siblings/>
<Children/>
</PersonOfInterest >

The code to populate that schema will work for any starting point or
person right?  Each collection type is the same schema of Person


-- 
Stephen Russell

Sr. Production Systems Programmer
CIMSgts

901.246-0159 cell

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to