On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Paul McNett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/31/10 6:36 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>> Do you see a better method for presentation of this complicated data?
>
> I think it should be objectified. As you noted it is the same pattern 
> throughout. I
> just don't think it calls for XML, the continual parsing of which seems 
> unnecessarily
> heavy.
>
> XML seems to me like a great export/import format for data. And it works as a 
> means
> to move presentation data over a network, say from a web service to a web 
> page in an
> Ajax situation, but it doesn't seem to me to be the best format even in that 
> case.
-----------------------------

Paul, question was do you see a better method.  Your answer was just a
pissing on an idea and nothing new for a replacement.

So if XML was not good enough, what per say is a better replacement?

I visualize a treeview control to help the user see the bigger picture
initially showing root node with first level node collections and
listing member of them.  This is just for use as an elementary "sub
picker" and not to be confused with THE DISPLAY.

Because I am schema consistent across all nodes movement should easily
roll to whatever the UI is.

I'll take the hit for data collection at a delta on PersonOfIterest.
Then cache it for different views of same person.

Anyone else have a method for doing this?
-- 
Stephen Russell

Sr. Production Systems Programmer
CIMSgts

901.246-0159 cell

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to