On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Paul McNett <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/24/11 7:00 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: >> WIN7 is so much better then that crappy old XP. Get over it and roll >> with a superior product. > > From a business standpoint, with users needing email, browser, Act, Mas90, > and > Office, can you really claim that they do their jobs much more effectively > with Win7 > versus XP? > > From a business standpoint, if it costs them $100 to set up a WinXP system > versus > $400 to set up a Win7 system, is the eye-candy really worth the extra hardware > requirements, extra setup time, and extra maintenance time? ----------------
Interesting # difference here, where do you attribute the three hundred dollar discrepancy? Is is time or materials? I expect that the OS is on the new workstation. Everyone is back to replacing hardware these days because what they got in 05,6 and 07 is getting old and parts are failing. > If a truly superior product is desired, I couldn't in good faith recommend a > Microsoft technology. --------------- We know that you are religious zealot here Paul and that is understood. >> Or do you still desire a car with the shifter on a column? > > I desire a daily life that doesn't rely on automobiles at all, actually. --------------- Beam me up Scotty. ;-> -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
