Hi Raul, Yeah, I wondered about that, which is why I put orthogonal in quotes. So what did you mean by an non-orthogonal presentation? I am intrigued.
Cheers, bob On 2013-01-14, at 10:28 AM, Raul Miller wrote: >>> We can use a non-othogonal presentation of dimensions. >>> >> I think that this is closer to the direction that I chose, if I understand >> your use of 'orthogonal' to mean that the dimensions would need to remain >> independent in how they affected the representation. My choice was to >> enclose each group of 3 dimensions within a cube and then use these cubes to >> build higher dimensions. Once you get above 6, things start to get messy and >> so the challenge becomes what you can leave out without creating ambiguity. > > Actually, I'd classify this as "boxing". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
