u: 9856+i. 6 results in 6 empty boxes?  I had no trouble getting chess pieces.

I tried (jqt font size 16)

u:200 50$i.10000

and don't see any dice.  Any ideas? Theree are many symbols but also many boxes.

Linda


-----Original Message-----
From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com 
[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Björn Helgason
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 12:40 PM
To: Programming forum
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Repeated rolling dice

To display the dice:

u: 9856+i. 6
⚀⚁⚂⚃⚄⚅

u: 9855+5 1 4 1 5 2 2 6 2 4 5 6 1 3 6 2 1 4 4 2 ⚄⚀⚃⚀⚄⚁⚁⚅⚁⚃⚄⚅⚀⚂⚅⚁⚀⚃⚃⚁ On 29 Dec 
2014 11:15, "Linda Alvord" <lindaalv...@verizon.net> wrote:

> After reading this thread from September, I couldn't resist an 
> "elementary school" version, shown twice below:
>
>
>
>    f=: 13 :'>:?y$6'
>
>    ]A=:f 20                                     NB. Original rolls
>
> 5 1 4 1 5 2 2 6 2 4 5 6 1 3 6 2 1 4 4 2
>
>    }:1,6~:A
>
> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
>
>    ]B=:(}:1,6~:A)<;.1 A                        NB. Boxes show extra rolls
>
> --T-T-T-T-T-T-T---T-T-T---T-T---T-T-T-T-┐
>
> │5│1│4│1│5│2│2│6 2│4│5│6 1│3│6 2│1│4│4│2│
>
> L-+-+-+-+-+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+---+-+-+-+--
>
>    ]C=:+/"1 >B                                 NB. Value of rolls
>
> 5 1 4 1 5 2 2 8 4 5 7 3 8 1 4 4 2
>
>    $C                                          NB. Usable answers
>
> 17
>
>
>
>    f=: 13 :'>:?y$6'
>
>    ]A=:f 20                                    NB. Original rolls
>
> 1 2 6 6 6 5 3 5 1 6 6 3 1 4 2 6 4 1 2 2
>
>    }:1,6~:A
>
> 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
>
>    ]B=:(}:1,6~:A)<;.1 A                        NB. Boxes show extra rolls
>
> --T-T-------T-T-T-T-----T-T-T-T---T-T-T-┐
>
> │1│2│6 6 6 5│3│5│1│6 6 3│1│4│2│6 4│1│2│2│
>
> L-+-+-------+-+-+-+-----+-+-+-+---+-+-+--
>
>    ]C=:+/"1 >B                                 NB. Value of rolls
>
> 1 2 23 3 5 1 15 1 4 2 10 1 2 2
>
>     $C                                          NB. Usable answers
>
> 14
>
>
>
>  Linda
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Raul 
> Miller
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 11:50 PM
> To: Programming forum
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Repeated rolling dice
>
>
>
> In addition to Pascal's comments, "0 can sometimes run into an issue 
> with word formation rules (when the argument to the right begins with a 
> number).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> --
>
> Raul
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Johann Hibschman < 
> <mailto:jhibsch...@gmail.com> jhibsch...@gmail.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks, that's helpful, although the tacit version of "bulk" is a 
> > bit
>
> > too much for me to parse.
>
> >
>
> > I imagine factor of 2 helps because it gets you over the expected 
> > 6r5
>
> > rolls per "game", assuming I did that recurrence right
>
> > (e=(5r6*1)+1r6*(1+e)).
>
> >
>
> > I do have some lingering style questions though:
>
> >
>
> > 1. It looks to me like David Lambert's solution used both (&>) and
>
> > (">) to force a verb to apply to the atoms, which I would write ("0).
>
> > Are there any particular reasons to prefer one over the other? ("0)
>
> > may require a ([) to avoid merging with a follow-up literal, (&>)
>
> > seems a little like exploiting a side-effect of (>), and (">) could
>
> > just as easily be ("+) or any other 0 0 0 verb.
>
> >
>
> > 2. Is there any difference between (bind) and (@:)? They look to me
>
> > like they would be identical.
>
> >
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Johann
>
> >
>
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Raul Miller <
> <mailto:rauldmil...@gmail.com> rauldmil...@gmail.com>
>
> > wrote:
>
> > > That is very close to what I came up with, for the case where we
>
> > > want
>
> > only
>
> > > a single value from our result:
>
> > >
>
> > >    d6=:1 + ? bind 6
>
> > >    repd6=: [:+/(,d6)^:(6={:)@d6
>
> > >
>
> > > Here's a variation on Roger Hui's approach, for the case where we
>
> > > want N values from our result:
>
> > >
>
> > > d6s=: 1 + [: ? #&6
>
> > > bulk=:{.#&0(],~(+/;.1~1:}:@,0~:6&|)@(],d6s@[))^:(
> <mailto:0=6&;|@%7b:@%7b.)%5e:_~> 0=6&|@{:@{.)^:_~]
>
> > >
>
> > > Example use:
>
> > >    bulk 20
>
> > > 5 5 5 4 3 3 2 3 3 9 1 4 16 3 3 1 3 17 3 4
>
> > >
>
> > > This would probably be much clearer if implemented explicitly 
> > > rather
>
> > > than tacitly, and probably would be more efficient also. So:
>
> > >
>
> > > bulkd6s=:3 :0
>
> > >   r=. i. 0
>
> > >   while. y >: #r do.
>
> > >     r=. r, d6s y
>
> > >     mask=. }: 1, 0~:6|r
>
> > >     r=. mask +/;.1 r
>
> > >   end.
>
> > >   y{.r
>
> > > )
>
> > >
>
> > > But statistically speaking, this is still not as efficient as it
>
> > > could
>
> > be.
>
> > > I think we'd do better with:
>
> > >
>
> > > bulkd6=:3 :0
>
> > >   r=. i. 0
>
> > >   while. y >: #r do.
>
> > >     r=. r, d6s 2*y
>
> > >     mask=. }: 1, 0~:6|r
>
> > >     r=. mask +/;.1 r
>
> > >   end.
>
> > >   y{.r
>
> > > )
>
> > >
>
> > > Do you see why this tends to be more efficient?
>
> > >
>
> > > Thanks,
>
> > >
>
> > > --
>
> > > Raul
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:50 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming 
> > > <
>
> > >  <mailto:programm...@jsoftware.com> programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > >> this works
>
> > >>
>
> > >> (, >:@?@6:)^:((0=#) +. 6={:)^:_ i.0
>
> > >>
>
> > >>    ([: +/ (, >:@?@6:)^:((0=#) +. 6={:)^:_) i.0
>
> > >> 11
>
> > >>
>
> > >>
>
> > >>
>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > >> From: Johann Hibschman < <mailto:jhibsch...@gmail.com>
> jhibsch...@gmail.com>
>
> > >> To: Programming forum < <mailto:programm...@jsoftware.com>
> programm...@jsoftware.com>
>
> > >> Cc:
>
> > >> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 9:06 AM
>
> > >> Subject: [Jprogramming] Repeated rolling dice
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Hi all,
>
> > >>
>
> > >> For fun, I've been running some statistics for a game with an
>
> > >> unusual rule for rolling dice: if a 6 is rolled, roll again and 
> > >> add
>
> > >> the result, repeating on any subsequent 6s. I wanted to implement
>
> > >> this in J, collecting all the individual rolls (rather than just
>
> > >> the sum.)
>
> > >>
>
> > >> It seems like there should be a more clever and elegant way to do
>
> > >> this, but this is what I have:
>
> > >>
>
> > >> NB. Simple roll.
>
> > >> roll0 =: >:@?
>
> > >>
>
> > >> NB. This seems to work, but it's not very clever.
>
> > >> roll =: 3 : 0
>
> > >>   r =. >:?y
>
> > >>   if. r=y do. r=. r,(roll y) end.
>
> > >>   r
>
> > >> )
>
> > >>
>
> > >> NB. Attempt at iterating via power.  Fails because repeats NB.
>
> > >> signal termination.
>
> > >> roll0^:(6&=)^:(<_) 6
>
> > >>
>
> > >> NB. Attempt at iterating via agenda.  Not even close yet.
>
> > >> NB. ]`(]+$:) @. (=&6)  NB. where to stick in the roll?
>
> > >>
>
> > >> This gives what I expect:
>
> > >>
>
> > >>    roll"0 ] 10#6
>
> > >> 6 1 0
>
> > >> 3 0 0
>
> > >> 3 0 0
>
> > >> 2 0 0
>
> > >> 5 0 0
>
> > >> 2 0 0
>
> > >> 6 6 2
>
> > >> 2 0 0
>
> > >> 1 0 0
>
> > >> 6 3 0
>
> > >>
>
> > >> But is there a better way to do this? Also, are there any known
>
> > >> issues with the RNG? I've not gathered enough statistics to prove
>
> > >> it, but the results look clumpier (more identical values in a 
> > >> row)
> than
> I expect.
>
> > >> Now, I know that's a common cognitive bias, so it may just be me,
>
> > >> but is there a discussion of the quality of the RNG somewhere?
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Thanks,
>
> > >> Johann
>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --
>
> > >> --- For information about J forums see
>
> > >>  <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> > >>
>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --
>
> > >> --- For information about J forums see
>
> > >>  <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> > >>
>
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
>
> > > -- For information about J forums see
>
> > >  <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
>
> > For information about J forums see  
> > <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For information about J forums see  
> <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to