What baffles me is the implication that atomic representations should not
be used because their linear representations can be verbose.

By the way, the use of the form  v Adv  was a worst case scenario; I
thought that would be clear to everyone, given the context, but apparently
was not.

I am rephrasing my statement just in case someone else also got confused:
if the case when the tally of the  agenda  of  @.  is grater than one or
boxed were not supported (tacit) adverbial programming would still be
complete.


On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> Which gets back to me being baffled by the thinking that @. is not
> necessary because we can use a 532 character expression instead.
>
> --
> Raul
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Jose Mario Quintana
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Right, I did think it was that easy ;)
> >
> > As the subject of this thread clearly implies we, Dan and I, were talking
> > about tacit adverbs.  "The use of illegal steroids is not appreciated in
> > this venue! :)"
> >
> > Incidentally, the size of linear representation of Adv has a lot to do
> with
> > the verbosity of linear representations of words involving atomic
> > representations.  Why should one be so concerned about it?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Explicit is an alternative, also.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Raul
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Jose Mario Quintana
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > "There are always alternatives."  I am really curious, can you produce
> >> any
> >> > arbitrary tacit adverb where neither  @.  nor  `:6  appear in its
> code?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I am probably being something horrible, but... I'm kind of baffled by
> >> >> the thinking that @. is not necessary because we can use a 532
> >> >> character expression instead.
> >> >>
> >> >> I mean, ok, sure, technically almost nothing is actually "necessary"
> >> >> because there are always alternatives. But, taken to its logical
> >> >> limit, computers fall in the same bucket, along with chairs, cars,
> and
> >> >> a variety of other such things which begin with the letter 'c'.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Raul
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Jose Mario Quintana
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> > I am glad to see you around here Dan.  If you only show around here
> >> from
> >> >> > time to time, or not ever again, the patrons and instructors can
> >> learn a
> >> >> > lot from you as your first post shows.  By the way, as long as
> there
> >> are
> >> >> > patrons and instructors, it is everybody's Jym.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Regarding  @. ,in the context of this Jym, I also avoid it and, as
> far
> >> >> as I
> >> >> > can see, it can always be avoided (even from an orthodox
> standpoint)
> >> >> > because Adv's definition [0] does not rely on it and, in principle
> at
> >> >> > least, any tacit adverb can be expressed as v Adv.  I currently use
> >> it in
> >> >> > one tool, not because it is necessary, but because the context is
> >> ideal
> >> >> for
> >> >> >  @.  and therefore it is very efficient.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [0] [Jprogramming] Tacit Toolkit (was dyadic J)
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2015-December/043678.html
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Dan Bron <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Pepe wrote:
> >> >> >> > Instructors (Dan, Thomas et al. are you listening?),
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I always listen when you speak, Sensei. Though in recently years
> my
> >> >> review
> >> >> >> of J Forum traffic has been more sporadic.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > a1 =:(`{.)(`{:)(@.1 0 2)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hey, I never thought of doing a1 in that fashion.  Neat approach.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Personally, I keep @. in reserve, as my heavy artillery, for when
> my
> >> >> >> tactical mind, unsubtle as it is, is unavailable to find a way to
> >> route
> >> >> my
> >> >> >> infantry (primitive adverbs and bound primitive conjunctions)
> around
> >> a
> >> >> >> wall, and neither can my light cannon (`:6) pierce it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Anyway, to mix metaphors again, for those who are looking for some
> >> >> workout
> >> >> >> tips to train their tacit muscles (it is unwise to enter Pepe’s
> Jym
> >> >> >> unprepared), here’s a few I offered once, back when I could have
> >> been a
> >> >> >> contender:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2010-November/021172.html <
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2010-November/021172.html>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -Dan
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> For information about J forums see
> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > For information about J forums see
> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> >>
> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to