Infinite loop is bug, but replacing ok box with interrupt button 
is not a proper fix to the gl paint problem.  So far gl paint is
the only case that results in an infinite loop, so that I would
prefer a proper fix to the gl paint problem itself.

I suspect it is a deficiency of Qt graphic backend, since popup
box is at the top of z-order, the presence or absence of popup box
should not interfere the other windows.

Вс, 22 май 2016, Jan-Pieter Jacobs написал(а):
> I also happened to run into the infinite popup problem, both when trying to
> get started writing J GUI's (gave up because of this) and when using plot
> (accidentally not specifying options in the way they should be).
> 
> I agree that in that last case, it was probably a bug in the plot package,
> but in my opinion, the user or developper should never irrevokably loose
> control over the environment under whatever circumstance, also not when
> it's due to his own ignorance, or a bug in a package he's using. Certainly
> not when trying to promote J as the ideal tool for interactive
> experimentation.
> 
> If all experimentation should be stored in scripts, how is the workflow
> still so different from that of compiling languages?
> 
> So I would be a huge fan of a feature like an interrupt button for
> repeating popups, or making jbreak cleanly interrupt this kind of endless
> loops.
> 
> Just my two cents.
> 
> Jan-Pieter
> On May 20, 2016 12:41 PM, "Raul Miller" <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Has this been a big problem, for you? For anyone?
> >
> > The problem of being a J programmer and losing control of the system
> > is an immediate problem, and I think it's a bigger problem.
> >
> > Also, for those hypothetical end users who might be "confused" by an
> > option,  it would be possible to "remove choices on their behalf" if
> > that were actually important.  (That might be somewhat arrogant,
> > though, since this "removal" does not seem to improve anything for
> > them.)
> >
> > --
> > Raul
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:48 AM, bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > IMO errors reported in wdhandler reflect there are some
> > > programming bugs or unexpected behavior.  If it occurs in
> > > production systems then end users who have no J knowledge should
> > > whatsapp the screen shot to the developer. Providing more choices
> > > will confuse end users further.
> > >
> > > Пт, 20 май 2016, Raul Miller написал(а):
> > >> I am seeing some odd things here. One of which is that the previous
> > >> documentation for wdquery --
> > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/docs/help701/user/script_winlib.htm#wdquery
> > >> -- seems to no longer be valid. Another is that I can not find
> > >> documentation for wdquery for the current release. (And I am seeing
> > >> other oddities in behavior, but I am going to stop trying to enumerate
> > >> those oddities with those two observations.)
> > >>
> > >> Anyways, perhaps wdhandler should be changed, replacing
> > >>
> > >>       wdinfo 'wdhandler';'error in: ',wd_fn,wd_err
> > >>
> > >> with something like
> > >>
> > >>       if. 0~:wdquery 'wdhandler';'error in:
> > ',wd_fn,wd_err,LF,'continue?' do.
> > >>         echo 'DISABLED_',wd_fn
> > >>         ('DISABLED_',wd_fn)=: (5!:1<wd_fn)5!:0
> > >>         erase wd_fn
> > >>       end.
> > >>
> > >> (but, beware email induced line wrap)
> > >>
> > >> In other words:
> > >>
> > >> [1] Give the user the opportunity to continue. Depending on details of
> > >> other parts of the system, this may or may not result in further
> > >> problems.
> > >>
> > >> [2] If the user opts not to continue, set aside the definition of the
> > >> current event handler (which failed) and disable it. (Hypothetically
> > >> speaking, we might be able to skip the setting aside part, because the
> > >> definition should be in a script. However, in some cases it might not
> > >> be.)
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Raul
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:59 PM, bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > I checked agin, it is the local noun wd_fn inside wdhandler.
> > >> > so perhaps you can try
> > >> >  ". wd_fn,'=:empty'
> > >> >  or
> > >> >  4!:55 <wd_fn
> > >> > inside the catch block.
> > >> >
> > >> > Пт, 20 май 2016, bill lam написал(а):
> > >> >> the first few rows of wdq (global set inside wdhander) should
> > provide that
> > >> >> info. see j user manual or jwiki for wd documentation.
> > >> >> On May 20, 2016 6:55 AM, "Raul Miller" <rauldmil...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Is there a systematic way of determining which verb name is the
> > name
> > >> >> > of the currently running event handler?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Thanks,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > --
> > >> >> > Raul
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:27 AM, bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> > > c++ jqt side did not know what had happened on the j engine so
> > it will
> > >> >> > keep
> > >> >> > > on calling J on paint.  You need to make j paint verb a no-op
> > after the
> > >> >> > > first popup.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > For debug suspension, you may want try catchd instead of catch.
> > >> >> > suspension
> > >> >> > > in the presence of events is rather troublesome. IIRC all events
> > except
> > >> >> > > paint are discarded during suspension, so that you may still get
> > infinite
> > >> >> > > in suspension.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > what I used to do is set
> > >> >> > > wdinfo_z_=: smoutput_z_
> > >> >> > > in order to debug gl paint error.
> > >> >> > > On May 19, 2016 5:28 PM, "Raul Miller" <rauldmil...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > >> So... maybe it would make sense to replace
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >>       wdinfo 'wdhandler';'error in: ',wd_fn,wd_err
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >> in wdhandler with something like
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >>       if. -.wdquery 'wdhandler';'error in:
> > >> >> > >> ',wd_fn,wd_err,LF,'continue?' do.throw.end.
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >> ?
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >> Except... I tried that, and throw. was not sufficient to stop
> > the
> > >> >> > >> infinite condition with debugging disabled, and that line of
> > code
> > >> >> > >> never runs with debugging enabled. So there is something else
> > going
> > >> >> > >> on, also...
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >> Perhaps the best compromise for development purposes would be to
> > >> >> > >> disable the offending handler (erase the name) if the user
> > elects
> > >> >> > >> cancelling out of it?
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >> Thanks,
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >> --
> > >> >> > >> Raul
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:36 PM, bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> > >> > the popup dialog box is raised by a try catch block in the
> > verb
> > >> >> > >> wdhandler,
> > >> >> > >> > since it does not throw an error after the popup, there is no
> > >> >> > suspension.
> > >> >> > >> > the gl area partially hidden by the popup box is repainted
> > and since
> > >> >> > the
> > >> >> > >> gl
> > >> >> > >> > paint or any other jqt events has no knowledge that there has
> > been an
> > >> >> > >> error
> > >> >> > >> > in j wdhander being caught so there is an infinite loop.  You
> > may add
> > >> >> > >> some
> > >> >> > >> > codes in the j paint verb to detect that error condition.
> > >> >> > >> >
> > >> >> > >> > this had been reported but fixing it is a low priority.
> > >> >> > >> > On May 19, 2016 5:09 AM, "Raul Miller" <rauldmil...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >
> > >> >> > >> >> Currently, if I am using the gl commands for an isigraph
> > control, and
> > >> >> > >> >> there's an error, I get behavior which I do not understand.
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> (1) I get a popup telling me that there was an error (and
> > giving me
> > >> >> > >> >> the details of the error.
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> (2) I only have an "OK" option on that popup.
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> (3) When I click "OK", execution resumes as if there were no
> > error
> > >> >> > >> >> (presumably on the line following the line with the error.
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> This quickly leads to an infinite loop condition where my
> > only option
> > >> >> > >> >> is to shut down J.
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> At the very least, I think I should get an option to have
> > the error
> > >> >> > >> >> stop execution somehow.
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> (13!:0]1 avoids this problem, but why was it a good idea to
> > make me
> > >> >> > >> >> lose control of the J session in the first place?)
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> (I'm not sure if this goes in jsource, since I think this is
> > a jqt
> > >> >> > >> >> issue, not a j engine issue. Please let me know, though, if
> > there's a
> > >> >> > >> >> better forum for this topic.)
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> Thanks,
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> --
> > >> >> > >> >> Raul
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> > >> >> For information about J forums see
> > >> >> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >> >> > >> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> > >> > For information about J forums see
> > >> >> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >> >> > >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> > >> For information about J forums see
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >> >> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> > > For information about J forums see
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >> >> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> > For information about J forums see
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > regards,
> > >> > ====================================================
> > >> > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> > >> > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> > >> > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
> > >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > For information about J forums see
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> > > --
> > > regards,
> > > ====================================================
> > > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> > > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> > > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

-- 
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to