Does  the "-prompt" option work for you?

On Fri, May 15, 2020, 9:46 AM Devon McCormick <[email protected]> wrote:

> OK - Finally got Win 10 started while only on my first beer, installed J
> 9.02 but still get no prompt under emacs.  I did full installs with pacman.
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 9:26 PM Devon McCormick <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > It looks like my usual "jconsole under emacs" problem - no prompt - is
> > back.  This time, running with an older version of the console does not
> > appear to fix it.
> > I notice that the new jconsole.exe is substantially larger than the older
> > version.
> > Do other emacs users get this problem or is it a Windows 7 issue?
> >
> > I went to my Windows 10 machine to try it there but
> > 1) computer will not come out of sleep mode, so I hold down the power
> > button whereupon
> > 2) I get the message "Applying updates/Do not turn off your computer"
> > 3) I go get a beer.
> > When I come back, I see the message "We couldn't complete the
> > update/Undoing changes/Do not turn off your computer"
> > 4) I wait for a while until I see the windows logo, then
> > 5) go to 2.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:53 PM bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> the non blas implementation is also good and keeps improving, the
> relative
> >> performance varies between different platforms, cpu, compilers, so there
> >> is
> >> no definite answer to the best threshold values. If you found non blas
> is
> >> always better in your computer, then you can disable blas in your
> >> startup.ijs .
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 15, 2020, 8:45 AM Joey K Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > OK, that makes sense (I love it when a 1000 1000 matrix product is
> >> "small"
> >> > - thinking back to when I first did that benchmark in a 32 KILObyte
> APL
> >> > workspace - Moore's law has been quite a ride!)
> >> >
> >> > But I'm still a little puzzled why my "default" appears to perform in
> >> > between always and never.
> >> >
> >> > > On 2020May 14, at 17:36, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > +/ . * has 2 implementions blas and non blas, generally blas is
> >> faster on
> >> > > large matrix. there are default thresholds m*n*p to choose blas, the
> >> > monad
> >> > > (9!:58)"0 i.3
> >> > > reports the threshold for integer, double and complex.
> >> > > the dyad set the threshold with 2 special values that I had
> mentioned.
> >> > >
> >> > > % . calls +/ . * internally in its implemention.
> >> > >
> >> > > I suspect the size of matrix you tested is "small" by today's
> >> standard so
> >> > > non blas is faster.
> >> > >
> >> > > This needs tuning, you may experiment with different thresholds and
> >> > > different matrixes to get the best results.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, May 15, 2020, 8:17 AM Joey K Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Bill,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I had no idea about this - where can I read about blas vs non-blas?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> It would seem that my "default" is neither of your suggested cases
> -
> >> but
> >> > >> again, no idea what is implied.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> MBpro-3:~ jkt$ jb
> >> > >>   JVERSION
> >> > >> Engine: j902/j64avx2/darwin
> >> > >> Beta-a: commercial/2020-05-09T10:56:17 clang-11-0-0
> >> > >> Library: 9.02.03
> >> > >> Platform: Darwin 64
> >> > >> Installer: J902 install
> >> > >> InstallPath: /applications/j902
> >> > >> Contact: www.jsoftware.com
> >> > >>   3 timex '%. 1000 1000 ?@$ 0'
> >> > >> 0.2393233333 44041920
> >> > >>   0 (9!:58)"0 i.3
> >> > >> 1 1 1
> >> > >>   3 timex '%. 1000 1000 ?@$ 0'
> >> > >> 0.3294893333 44041920
> >> > >>   _1 (9!:58)"0 i.3
> >> > >> 1 1 1
> >> > >>   3 timex '%. 1000 1000 ?@$ 0'
> >> > >> 0.2068576667 44041920
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I do like the increased speed from the default to the _1 (9!:58)"0
> >> i.3
> >> > >> case. I would like to know more about the implications.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> On 2020May 14, at 16:23, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Joey, another possibility is blas vs non-blas code being called.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> foreign 9!:58 can set threshold
> >> > >>> _1 (9!:58)"0 i.3       NB.  +/ .*  never use blas
> >> > >>> 0 (9!:58)"0 i.3        NB.  +/ .*  alwasy use blas
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Can you try execute
> >> > >>> _1 (9!:58)"0 i.3
> >> > >>> then run your benchmark, then execute
> >> > >>> 0 (9!:58)"0 i.3
> >> > >>> then run benchmark again and verify which mode you are using by
> >> > default?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020, 5:32 AM Joey K Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> Installed under OS X 10.14.6 easily - but I'm puzzled why "my"
> >> > benchmark
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>  timex '%. 1000 1000 ?@$ 0'
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> takes more than twice as much cpu compared to j901...  (space
> used
> >> is
> >> > >>>> identical)
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>> On 2020May 14, at 14:27, Henry Rich <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> This beta has a few language changes:
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> * Fold (u F:. v) has been redefined to execute v first, then, u
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> * u0`u1`...@v now has infinite rank.  v is executed first to
> >> decide
> >> > the
> >> > >>>> cell-rank, and which verb is to be executed for each cell; then
> >> the u
> >> > >> verbs
> >> > >>>> are executed, either one cell at a time or in one call to each
> >> verb,
> >> > to
> >> > >>>> execute on a list of cells at once. Therefore, each u verb needs
> >> to be
> >> > >> able
> >> > >>>> to handle single cell or a list of input cells.
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> * semiduals are supported at last: x u&.:(v`a:) y applies v only
> >> to
> >> > x,
> >> > >>>> and x u&.:(a:`v) y applies v only to y.
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Henry Rich
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> On 5/14/2020 3:49 PM, Eric Iverson wrote:
> >> > >>>>>> The first 902 beta release is available for
> windows/macos/linux.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/Installation/J902
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> Availability of new releases will be announced here.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> Questions, problems, etc should be addressed to the beta forum.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>>>>> For information about J forums see
> >> > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> --
> >> > >>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> >> > >>>>> https://www.avg.com
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>>>> For information about J forums see
> >> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>>> For information about J forums see
> >> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>> For information about J forums see
> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> For information about J forums see
> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > For information about J forums see
> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> >
> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> >
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Devon McCormick, CFA
> >
> > Quantitative Consultant
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Devon McCormick, CFA
>
> Quantitative Consultant
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to