Bill wrote:
> Is there a reason qdoj doesn't seem to work on my J602 system?
You're probably right that the directory structure changed between versions.
> perhaps someone would want to fix qdoj to work on
> both J601 and J602 (or perhaps not).
I may, but even if I do it still has some big flaws. It might be better to
rethink the goals that led me to create it, and write something that comes
closer to satisfying those goals.
> is there a reason scriptdoc seems to have
> problems [with qdoj] ?
Two reasons: the first reason scriptdoc'qdoj' fails is the same reason
load'qdoj' fails. If you want to use a short name like 'qdoj' instead of a
FQN like 'C:\path\to\qdoj.ijs' then you'll have to register the
short-name/FQN association first.
That registration occurs in PUBLIC_j_ :
PUBLIC_j_ =: PUBLIC_j_ , 'qdoj';'C:\path\to\qdoj.ijs'
Now you can use scriptdoc'qdoj' and you won't get the popup. However, you'll
promptly run into the second problem: I didn't document qdoj :) There's
no quick fix for that one.
-Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
