I think the following uses are not expected as normal. However, it is out of my curiosity, and from my hideous bugs hunting experiences:
3 (+&2.1) 5 11.3 It seems like, in this case, +&m is y+m*x. What about the following? 1 9 (i.&2) 1 2 1 1 1 9 (i.&3) 1 2 2 1 1 9 (i.&1) 1 2 0 0 1 9 (i.&0) 1 2 2 1 Is there a general rule for dyadic use of bonded verbs? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
