http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d630n.htm
x m&v y ↔ m&v^:x y x u&n y ↔ u&n^:x y 2009/7/3 June Kim <[email protected]>: > I think the following uses are not expected as normal. However, it is > out of my curiosity, and from my hideous bugs hunting experiences: > > 3 (+&2.1) 5 > 11.3 > > It seems like, in this case, +&m is y+m*x. > > What about the following? > > 1 9 (i.&2) 1 2 > 1 1 > 1 9 (i.&3) 1 2 > 2 1 > 1 9 (i.&1) 1 2 > 0 0 > 1 9 (i.&0) 1 2 > 2 1 > > Is there a general rule for dyadic use of bonded verbs? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
