Yes, this is like using a number in an expression, like "2" here,
2-~/\I.' '=' How far, here, between each pair of "spaces"? ' 4 5 6 8 5 5 3 10 to get the difference of each (overlapping) pair of indexes. On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Matthew Brand <[email protected]>wrote: > i.e. > > (+&2.1)^:(3) 5 > 11.3 > > (+&2.1)@(+&2.1)@(+&2.1) 5 > 11.3 > > > 2009/7/3 Matthew Brand <[email protected]>: > > http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d630n.htm > > > > > > x m&v y ↔ m&v^:x y > > x u&n y ↔ u&n^:x y > > > > > > 2009/7/3 June Kim <[email protected]>: > >> I think the following uses are not expected as normal. However, it is > >> out of my curiosity, and from my hideous bugs hunting experiences: > >> > >> 3 (+&2.1) 5 > >> 11.3 > >> > >> It seems like, in this case, +&m is y+m*x. > >> > >> What about the following? > >> > >> 1 9 (i.&2) 1 2 > >> 1 1 > >> 1 9 (i.&3) 1 2 > >> 2 1 > >> 1 9 (i.&1) 1 2 > >> 0 0 > >> 1 9 (i.&0) 1 2 > >> 2 1 > >> > >> Is there a general rule for dyadic use of bonded verbs? > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Devon McCormick, CFA ^me^ at acm. org is my preferred e-mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
