i.e. (+&2.1)^:(3) 5 11.3
(+&2.1)@(+&2.1)@(+&2.1) 5 11.3 2009/7/3 Matthew Brand <[email protected]>: > http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d630n.htm > > > x m&v y ↔ m&v^:x y > x u&n y ↔ u&n^:x y > > > 2009/7/3 June Kim <[email protected]>: >> I think the following uses are not expected as normal. However, it is >> out of my curiosity, and from my hideous bugs hunting experiences: >> >> 3 (+&2.1) 5 >> 11.3 >> >> It seems like, in this case, +&m is y+m*x. >> >> What about the following? >> >> 1 9 (i.&2) 1 2 >> 1 1 >> 1 9 (i.&3) 1 2 >> 2 1 >> 1 9 (i.&1) 1 2 >> 0 0 >> 1 9 (i.&0) 1 2 >> 2 1 >> >> Is there a general rule for dyadic use of bonded verbs? >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
