Should or should not, in principle, the dictionary be a clear and unambiguous reference source for the core language? In any case, where is (or was) the level of redundancy regarding the fork’s order-of-execution?
________________________________ From: Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> To: Programming forum <programming@jsoftware.com> Sent: Thu, January 14, 2010 2:56:18 PM Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] The Ambiguous Dictionary On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jose Mario Quintana > In my opinion R.E. Boss’ point still stands (notwithstanding > what Wikipedia’s value as a general source of reference might > be from one’s point of view). What can be sufficiently clear > to the writer might not be to the reader and redundancy (from > the author perspective) could clarify the exposition of difficult > concepts (from a reader’s viewpoint). Is there some kind of problem with tutorials and other works providing this level of redundancy? -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
