I am happy to do more. But as you said, I think it is important to get a broad range of perspectives, and a broader range of feedback on those perspectives.
I would task every veteran who's chimed in on this thread, or indicated he thinks the procet important, to write a J vocab page. He should write it in exactly the way he thinks best. I would further task every J newcomer who has expressed frustration with the current materials to provide feedback on at least one of these pages (and ideally as many as possible; not so bad, because he need only indicate what's helpful and what's not). This approach will have two advantages: we'll have a lot of raw material to work with, and no one person will spend an undue amount of time composing entries in a style that ends up deprecated. -Dan Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device. -----Original Message----- From: Ian Clark <earthspo...@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 02:00:30 To: Programming forum<programming@jsoftware.com> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] The Accessible Dictionary Dan, certainly a lot of meat to chew here. More... more... Ian On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Jim Russell <jimsruss...@comcast.net> wrote: > Dan, wonderful! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
