Not 'scholastic' surely, Ian? I'd have thought a bit
biblical (as near as us atheists get) might be a better
description. But I'm serious in wondering whether any
'language' can do more.
Anthony
On 10/06/2011 09:51, Ian Clark wrote:
>> What about omnipotent?
> ...bit scholastic, Anthony?
>
> I welcomed Tolkien's thrust to purge English of its French and Latin
> imports. Guess Ken was doing the same with computerese.
>
> Since Google Translate doesn't support Anglo Saxon (yet), I tried
> "omnipotent" with Danish instead -- it gave me what amounts to
> "almighty"...
>
> So:
>
> proalmighty{dot}.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Anthony Camacho<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> What about omnipotent?
>> Anthony
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
