We should not complicate common cases in order to satisfy more special requirements. Have you looked at 6!:9 (Query Clock Counter) or the performance monitor?
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Brian Schott <schott.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > This thread makes me think that the dyadic form of 6!:2 would be > better if it produced the individual times and not the average of the > times because then the mean and the standard deviation or some other > measure of dispersion could be extracted directly from the results. > > Also, perhaps a similar dyadic form could be added to 7!:2, but this > is not as important for most operations. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
