On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Brian Schott <schott.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This thread makes me think that the dyadic form of 6!:2 would be
> better if it produced the individual times and not the average of the
> times because then the mean and the standard deviation or some other
> measure of dispersion could be extracted directly from the results.

Or you could instead take advantage of how the primitive is designed
to get this information.  For example:

   5 (6!:2~ #&1)~ '+/?~1000'
0.0327572 0.000112649 0.000100492 9.96819e_5 0.000145876

-- 
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to