You have a very fast laptop to get numbers like these.

>   6!:8''
> 2.46785e6

and

>   _10 [\ 2 -~/\ 6!:9"1 i.101 0
> 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
> 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
> 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
> 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
> 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
> 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
> 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
> 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 0



On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>   6!:8''
> 2.46785e6
>
> --
> Raul
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Roger Hui <rogerhui.can...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What does 6!:8 '' say?  (On Unix, J does not use a clock with 
>> high-resolution.)
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Roger Hui <rogerhui.can...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hooks with one or more ~'s always throw me for a loop.
>>>
>>> I think of (g~ h)~ as a left hook.
>>>
>>>>   _10 [\ 2 -~/\ 6!:9"1 i.101 0
>>>
>>> That's a fun one.
>>>
>>> That said, my work laptop is making me wonder if a more precise
>>> counter is available:
>>>
>>>   _10 [\ 2 -~/\ 6!:9"1 i.101 0
>>> 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
>>> 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
>>> 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
>>> 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
>>> 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
>>> 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
>>> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
>>> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
>>> 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
>>> 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 0
>>>
>>> Mind you, I do not know what I would do with a more precise counter.
>>> But, nevertheless, I wonder...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Raul
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to