I've thought of this too but it's easy enough to roll your own, e.g.: tms=. 6!:2&>100$<'foo arg'
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Brian Schott <schott.br...@gmail.com>wrote: > This thread makes me think that the dyadic form of 6!:2 would be > better if it produced the individual times and not the average of the > times because then the mean and the standard deviation or some other > measure of dispersion could be extracted directly from the results. > > Also, perhaps a similar dyadic form could be added to 7!:2, but this > is not as important for most operations. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Devon McCormick, CFA ^me^ at acm. org is my preferred e-mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
