Lu pasti ga pernah belajar Islam, mungkin ustad lu anggap lu ini sbg cewek cuma 
punya 1/2 akal alias idiot, ga ada guna ngajarin lu.





>________________________________
> From: arra_s <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 6:31 AM
>Subject: [proletar] Re: Islam didiskriminasi di Inggris, hehehe...
> 
>
>  
>
>hari gini lu masih ngais ngais mahar?
>hehehe..  percuma dah lu hidup di jaman internet..
>jaman dimana urusan duit, jadi semakin mudah..
>
>cewek yg lu sebut di bawah ini nggak pernah mikirin ttg mahar dan pesangon.. 
>malah baru denger klo cerai ada pesangon..
>PHK kali yg ada pesangon nya.. 
>
>lu punya bini ngga Tem..  kalo punya hehe pastinya lu sering di kibulin si 
>bini.. karena lu ngga tahu kan... kalau 
>perempuan jaman sekarang punya hobby baru..  nge cek saldo..
>
>kalo nasib beda, cara mikir juga beda Tem..
>makanya jualan lu ngga laku disini..
>nasib beda sih..
>
>
>--- In [email protected], item abu <itemabu@...> wrote:
>>
>> Tentunya si arra_s sbg orang Islam yg baik akan bilang bhw Islam 
>> didiskriminasi di Inggris krn ga bisa make hukum syariat dlm kasus 
>> perceraian ini di mana cewek yg dicerai diputuskan hrs dpt uangdr bekas 
>> suaminya. 
>> 
>> Nurut Islam, cewek yg dicerai itu udah dihormati dgn boleh tetap memiliki 
>> mahar yg didptnya krn udah diembat oleh bekas suaminya, paling2 dikasih 
>> pesangon sekedarnya unt hiburan. Beda dgn hukum kafir laknatuloh yg 
>> mengharuskan si cewek dpt harta bekas suaminya.
>> 
>> Hukum harta gono gini ini jg diterapkan di Indonesia, makanya pejihad2 Islam 
>> mau ngeganti hukum bejad ini dgn hukum auloh spy cewek2 bisa lbh terhormat 
>> dgn kalo dicerai pake 3 kata, si cewek ga dpt apa2 lagi selain apa yg jadi 
>> haknya, yaitu mahar.
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2179041/You-use-sharia-law-divorce-deal-Muslim-hospital-consultant-told-pay-ex-wife-maintenance-despite-claims-owes-Islamic-rules.html#ixzz21hmJea7Z
>> 
>> 
>> You can't use sharia law in divorce deal: Muslim hospital consultant told to 
>> pay ex-wife maintenance despite claims he owes her nothing 
>> under Islamic rules
>> 
>>      * Dr Zaid Al-Saffar told he must follow 'the rule in this country' 
>> 
>>      * Ordered to pay £60,000 to his former wife, academic Hanan Al-Saffar
>>      * He felt the payments were illegitimate according to Islamic culture
>>      * Claims: 'Family law in this country is biased against Muslim 
>> people’ 
>> By Steve Doughty
>> PUBLISHED: 23:04 GMT, 25 July 2012  | UPDATED: 23:58 GMT, 25 July 2012 
>> 
>> Read more: 
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2179041/You-use-sharia-law-divorce-deal-Muslim-hospital-consultant-told-pay-ex-wife-maintenance-despite-claims-owes-Islamic-rules.html#ixzz21lCCLGOG
>> 
>> 
>> A Muslim hospital consultant was told yesterday that he must pay his ex-wife 
>> maintenance even though under 
>> Islamic rules he believes he owes her nothing.
>> 
>> A judge told Dr Zaid Al-Saffar that he must follow ‘the rule in this 
>> country’ and share his money.
>> 
>> 
>> The Appeal Court decision means Dr Al-Saffar must pay £60,000 to his former 
>> wife, academic Hanan Al-Saffar.
>> 
>> 
>> The ruling sounded a warning to Muslim couples who believe their marriages 
>> are ordered according to sharia law and agree to be bound by Islamic 
>> courts.
>> 
>> 
>> Lord Justice Ward told Dr Al-Saffar: ‘The rule in this country is that you 
>> share and the starting point is equal division. 
>> 
>> 
>> ‘You came out of the marriage without having made your wife any 
>> substantial capital payment.’ 
>> 
>> 
>> He added: ‘Life is sometimes hard; do not be consumed with bitterness.’ 
>> 
>> 
>> But Dr Al-Saffar said after the case: ‘By playing the system and 
>> pretending to be a victim she got everything, which I think is totally 
>> unfair. 
>> 
>> ‘Family law in this country is biased against Muslim people.’ 
>> 
>> 
>> The consultant rheumatologist at Scarborough Hospital in North Yorkshire, 
>> who is also the head of the Islamic Society in the resort town, was 
>> married for eight years, and the couple had two children. 
>> 
>> 
>> The marriage was formalised following the Islamic tradition of Mahr, under 
>> which the groom pays a gift to his bride.
>> 
>> 
>> Because of this, his wife had signed away her share of the couple’s home 
>> in Belvedere Road, in Scarborough. 
>> 
>> 
>> Dr Al-Saffar also assumed he had no 
>> obligation to make maintenance payments, and that, following Islamic 
>> practice, his former wife’s family would support her.
>> 
>> However, after the marriage fell apart in 2008, a county court judge ordered 
>> him to pay £60,000 to his wife in a hearing to settle the legal terms of 
>> their break-up. 
>> 
>> 
>> Dr Al-Saffar made payments for only four months but then contested the 
>> decision.
>> 
>> In
>> the Appeal Court, he told Lord Justice Ward that he had stopped paying 
>> because he had heard his former wife had inherited £250,000 from her 
>> father and had become ‘very, very well off’.
>> 
>> Dr Al-Saffar, who represented himself, told the court: ‘I have nothing but 
>> respect for the court’s order, but I only stopped paying because all 
>> her family were telling me she’s got millions. She doesn’t need it.’ 
>> 
>> But the judge said the doctor had 
>> been determined not to pay because ‘he felt the payments were 
>> illegitimate or illegal according to Islamic culture’. 
>> 
>> 
>> Lord Justice Ward said: ‘The husband has kept the whole of the capital in 
>> the marital home and the wife has not received any of it. 
>> 
>> ‘In those circumstances the order for spousal maintenance was a perfectly 
>> proper and fair order to make.’ 
>> 
>> 
>> The judge added: ‘The husband has to try to understand that inherited 
>> wealth is not available for distribution, especially when it comes in 
>> after or shortly before the breakdown of the marriage. 
>> 
>> 
>> 'That would not reduce the husband’s obligation to make a proper 
>> contribution to his wife.’
>> 
>> 
>> ‘I must dismiss this application,’ Lord Justice Ward said.
>> 
>> 
>> An unknown number of Muslim couples take their family disputes to sharia 
>> tribunals, usually run under the umbrella of local mosques. There are 
>> said to be around 85 operating in Britain.
>> 
>> 
>> They operate voluntarily, but critics say women may be disadvantaged if they 
>> agree to accept Islamic rules.
>> 
>> 
>> At present, if a sharia court settles a marriage dispute, an official law 
>> court has to approve the arrangement before the divorce is finalised.
>> 
>> 
>> The judge must decide whether it is reasonable and ensure neither party is 
>> disadvantaged. 
>> 
>> 
>> But agreements are submitted to the family court on a form just two pages 
>> long. The couple do not need to attend court.
>> 
>> 
>> The great majority are approved and critics say this process can amount to 
>> no more than rubber-stamping.
>> 
>> 
>> Four years ago Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams caused controversy 
>> when he said that full acceptance of sharia courts ‘seems unavoidable’.
>> 
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>
>
> 
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke