bininya si item lagi di leiden ngga bisa pulang kampung. tiap pulang kampung dideportasi mulu. kesian ya.
--- In [email protected], "arra_s" <arra_s@...> wrote: > > > hari gini lu masih ngais ngais mahar? > hehehe.. percuma dah lu hidup di jaman internet.. > jaman dimana urusan duit, jadi semakin mudah.. > > cewek yg lu sebut di bawah ini nggak pernah mikirin ttg mahar dan pesangon.. > malah baru denger klo cerai ada pesangon.. > PHK kali yg ada pesangon nya.. > > lu punya bini ngga Tem.. kalo punya hehe pastinya lu sering di kibulin si > bini.. karena lu ngga tahu kan... kalau > perempuan jaman sekarang punya hobby baru.. nge cek saldo.. > > kalo nasib beda, cara mikir juga beda Tem.. > makanya jualan lu ngga laku disini.. > nasib beda sih.. > > > --- In [email protected], item abu <itemabu@> wrote: > > > > Tentunya si arra_s sbg orang Islam yg baik akan bilang bhw Islam > > didiskriminasi di Inggris krn ga bisa make hukum syariat dlm kasus > > perceraian ini di mana cewek yg dicerai diputuskan hrs dpt uangdr bekas > > suaminya. > > > > Nurut Islam, cewek yg dicerai itu udah dihormati dgn boleh tetap memiliki > > mahar yg didptnya krn udah diembat oleh bekas suaminya, paling2 dikasih > > pesangon sekedarnya unt hiburan. Beda dgn hukum kafir laknatuloh yg > > mengharuskan si cewek dpt harta bekas suaminya. > > > > Hukum harta gono gini ini jg diterapkan di Indonesia, makanya pejihad2 > > Islam mau ngeganti hukum bejad ini dgn hukum auloh spy cewek2 bisa lbh > > terhormat dgn kalo dicerai pake 3 kata, si cewek ga dpt apa2 lagi selain > > apa yg jadi haknya, yaitu mahar. > > > > > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2179041/You-use-sharia-law-divorce-deal-Muslim-hospital-consultant-told-pay-ex-wife-maintenance-despite-claims-owes-Islamic-rules.html#ixzz21hmJea7Z > > > > > > You can't use sharia law in divorce deal: Muslim hospital consultant told > > to pay ex-wife maintenance despite claims he owes her nothing > > under Islamic rules > > > > * Dr Zaid Al-Saffar told he must follow 'the rule in this country' > > > > * Ordered to pay £60,000 to his former wife, academic Hanan Al-Saffar > > * He felt the payments were illegitimate according to Islamic culture > > * Claims: 'Family law in this country is biased against Muslim > > peopleâ > > By Steve Doughty > > PUBLISHED: 23:04 GMT, 25 July 2012 | UPDATED: 23:58 GMT, 25 July 2012 > > > > Read more: > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2179041/You-use-sharia-law-divorce-deal-Muslim-hospital-consultant-told-pay-ex-wife-maintenance-despite-claims-owes-Islamic-rules.html#ixzz21lCCLGOG > > > > > > A Muslim hospital consultant was told yesterday that he must pay his > > ex-wife maintenance even though under > > Islamic rules he believes he owes her nothing. > > > > A judge told Dr Zaid Al-Saffar that he must follow âthe rule in this > > countryâ and share his money. > > > > > > The Appeal Court decision means Dr Al-Saffar must pay £60,000 to his > > former wife, academic Hanan Al-Saffar. > > > > > > The ruling sounded a warning to Muslim couples who believe their marriages > > are ordered according to sharia law and agree to be bound by Islamic > > courts. > > > > > > Lord Justice Ward told Dr Al-Saffar: âThe rule in this country is that > > you share and the starting point is equal division. > > > > > > âYou came out of the marriage without having made your wife any > > substantial capital payment.â > > > > > > He added: âLife is sometimes hard; do not be consumed with bitterness.â > > > > > > But Dr Al-Saffar said after the case: âBy playing the system and > > pretending to be a victim she got everything, which I think is totally > > unfair. > > > > âFamily law in this country is biased against Muslim people.â > > > > > > The consultant rheumatologist at Scarborough Hospital in North Yorkshire, > > who is also the head of the Islamic Society in the resort town, was > > married for eight years, and the couple had two children. > > > > > > The marriage was formalised following the Islamic tradition of Mahr, under > > which the groom pays a gift to his bride. > > > > > > Because of this, his wife had signed away her share of the coupleâs home > > in Belvedere Road, in Scarborough. > > > > > > Dr Al-Saffar also assumed he had no > > obligation to make maintenance payments, and that, following Islamic > > practice, his former wifeâs family would support her. > > > > However, after the marriage fell apart in 2008, a county court judge > > ordered him to pay £60,000 to his wife in a hearing to settle the legal > > terms of > > their break-up. > > > > > > Dr Al-Saffar made payments for only four months but then contested the > > decision. > > > > In > > the Appeal Court, he told Lord Justice Ward that he had stopped paying > > because he had heard his former wife had inherited £250,000 from her > > father and had become âvery, very well offâ. > > > > Dr Al-Saffar, who represented himself, told the court: âI have nothing > > but respect for the courtâs order, but I only stopped paying because all > > her family were telling me sheâs got millions. She doesnât need it.â > > > > But the judge said the doctor had > > been determined not to pay because âhe felt the payments were > > illegitimate or illegal according to Islamic cultureâ. > > > > > > Lord Justice Ward said: âThe husband has kept the whole of the capital in > > the marital home and the wife has not received any of it. > > > > âIn those circumstances the order for spousal maintenance was a perfectly > > proper and fair order to make.â > > > > > > The judge added: âThe husband has to try to understand that inherited > > wealth is not available for distribution, especially when it comes in > > after or shortly before the breakdown of the marriage. > > > > > > 'That would not reduce the husbandâs obligation to make a proper > > contribution to his wife.â > > > > > > âI must dismiss this application,â Lord Justice Ward said. > > > > > > An unknown number of Muslim couples take their family disputes to sharia > > tribunals, usually run under the umbrella of local mosques. There are > > said to be around 85 operating in Britain. > > > > > > They operate voluntarily, but critics say women may be disadvantaged if > > they agree to accept Islamic rules. > > > > > > At present, if a sharia court settles a marriage dispute, an official law > > court has to approve the arrangement before the divorce is finalised. > > > > > > The judge must decide whether it is reasonable and ensure neither party is > > disadvantaged. > > > > > > But agreements are submitted to the family court on a form just two pages > > long. The couple do not need to attend court. > > > > > > The great majority are approved and critics say this process can amount to > > no more than rubber-stamping. > > > > > > Four years ago Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams caused > > controversy when he said that full acceptance of sharia courts âseems > > unavoidableâ. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ------------------------------------ Post message: [email protected] Subscribe : [email protected] Unsubscribe : [email protected] List owner : [email protected] Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
