On 16/05/2020 10:18, Ben Kochie wrote:


On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:13 AM Julius Volz <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:25 AM Ben Kochie <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Thanks for the link to the other survey. That's pretty good.

        On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:27 PM 'Tom Lee' via Prometheus Users
        <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Hi Richard,

            Reading between the lines it sounds like we're
            /potentially/ talking about a broader/larger "State of
            Clojure
            <https://clojure.org/news/2020/02/20/state-of-clojure-2020>"
            type thing for Prometheus. Is that accurate?

            Certainly don't mind the results being public. My only
            real concern is timelines: we were hoping to use some of
            the raw data to help advise some load testing on our end,
            and things are already looking pretty aggressive. If we're
            looking at something that's going to take weeks or more to
            start seeing results rolling in we probably won't quite
            get the data we were hoping to get in time. From a
            purely selfish perspective we'd be pretty disappointed to
            go forward without data from "the source", so to speak. Of
            course, I totally understand the team's actions here. I'm
            just whining to myself.

            Timelines aside, we'd be excited to see something
            "official" in the longer term. It would be useful for
            engineers like myself, and I know there are product
            managers and research folks lurking our virtual halls who
            would love such readily available data for future efforts.

            The questions from our survey:

              * Roughly how many Prometheus *servers* are you
                operationally responsible for?
              * Of all the Prometheus servers that you are responsible
                for, which version would you say is the most widely
                deployed?

         The first two questions are good. I might modify the first
        one to clarify with/without HA. For example, we have 21
        Prometheus servers, but 7 of those are duplicates for HA.

              * How many unique metrics are reporting across all of
                your Prometheus servers?
              * How many unique *timeseries* are reporting across all
                of your Prometheus servers?

        These two need to be clarified for Prometheus. We tend to use
        the terms metrics and time-series interchangeably. Are you
        asking about unique metric names?


    I guess the first question is about unique metric names. The
    problem is that there's no easy way to get the number of unique
    metric names across multiple servers, as there might be anything
    between 0 - 100% overlap of metric names between Prometheus
    servers, and getting users to calculate a set union might be too
    much work. Also, time series are more relevant than number of
    metrics in Prometheus, so maybe we should only keep the second
    question?


Yes, I'm interested in what Tom's intent is behind the question. From a Prometheus perspective, the total time-series load is most important. But it might be different for his use case.

We should probably include some specific PromQL queries to make the results easy to gather for survey participants.


I think it would be really useful to give details of how to find the answers to all the questions - simple command line commands, etc - PromQL query, python -V, etc.

It wants to be as easy as possible to answer in my opinion.

Would we be interested in the usage of the wider ecosystem? E.g usage of different SD methods, Alertmanager integrations, remote read/write systems, Thanos/Cortex/VictoriaMetrics?


              * If you use Grafana to visualize your Prometheus data,
                what version of Grafana do you typically use?
              * What value do you typically use for the
                "scrape_interval" config setting in your Prometheus
                servers?
              * Is there anything else you would like to tell us about
                your Prometheus deployment(s)? For example,
                interesting challenges, pain points, or quirks of your
                configuration?

        I have a few additional questions that could be added to the list.

        * How many unique exporter/target types do you have?
        * What is your samples/second ingestion rate across all
        Prometheus servers?
        * What is your general metric retention time?
        * Do you use external storage (Federation/remote_write/etc)
        * If yes, which external storage system(s)?

            Look forward to whatever might eventuate here, those big
            community surveys are always a lot of fun to read through.

            Cheers,
            Tom

            On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:25 AM Richard Hartmann
            <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Hi Tom,

                after some internal deliberation, we think it would be
                unfair to give
                any single survey our official blessing, and running
                more than once
                every, say, year seems to be too much for users, too.
                On the other
                hand, user surveys make sense for everyone.

                Would you be OK with sending your questions to
                [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]> or as a
                reply in this thread? We
                would then publish them for comments/feedback and run
                the survey under
                the Prometheus umbrella, sharing replies publicly.


                Best,
                Richard

                On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:44 PM 'Tom Lee' via
                Prometheus Users
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
                >
                > Understood Julius, appreciate the transparency.
                Thank you!
                >
                > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:37 PM Julius Volz
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
                >>
                >> Hi Tom,
                >>
                >> Thanks for checking in first! We're currently
                discussing within the Prometheus Team how we would
                prefer to handle such requests in general (so that
                things remain fair between companies, etc.) and will
                get back to you as soon.
                >>
                >> Regards,
                >> Julius
                >>
                >> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:21 PM 'Tom Lee' via
                Prometheus Users <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
                >>>
                >>> Hi folks,
                >>>
                >>> Full disclosure: I'm an engineer from New Relic
                (https://newrelic.com/). We've been looking into
                improving our open source monitoring story and
                Prometheus is a key piece of that. Right now, though,
                there are some pieces of the puzzle that we can't
                easily dig into without more input from the Prometheus
                community at large.
                >>>
                >>> Is this mailing list an okay place to send a
                Google Forms type survey with maybe half a dozen
                questions? And if not, can folks suggest somewhere
                that might be more appropriate?
                >>>
                >>> Cheers,
                >>> Tom
                >>>
                >>> --
                >>> You received this message because you are
                subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Users" group.
                >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
                emails from it, send an email to
                [email protected]
                <mailto:prometheus-users%[email protected]>.
                >>> To view this discussion on the web visit
                
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/b48e651a-b264-4ade-8eb8-7dc7eec11b15%40googlegroups.com.
                >>
                >>
                >>
                >> --
                >> Julius Volz
                >> PromLabs - promlabs.com <http://promlabs.com>
                >
                > --
                > You received this message because you are subscribed
                to the Google Groups "Prometheus Users" group.
                > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
                emails from it, send an email to
                [email protected]
                <mailto:prometheus-users%[email protected]>.
                > To view this discussion on the web visit
                
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CAMUmz5j6aqwyJ8aDmFvggkD%2BeTpMMLzM0zTp1kXgnFP%2Bd%3Dw5fQ%40mail.gmail.com.



-- Richard

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups "Prometheus Users" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
            from it, send an email to
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>.
            To view this discussion on the web visit
            
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CAMUmz5gNNk4naMFLJ_cWQJQO5g1pGVTZnn74FF4PV%3DHOmhpTqw%40mail.gmail.com
            
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CAMUmz5gNNk4naMFLJ_cWQJQO5g1pGVTZnn74FF4PV%3DHOmhpTqw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "Prometheus Users" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        To view this discussion on the web visit
        
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CABbyFmqGobiq7NUF-jzqGXOphhG8JjYrb%3D19C5Sm6W5CctmquA%40mail.gmail.com
        
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CABbyFmqGobiq7NUF-jzqGXOphhG8JjYrb%3D19C5Sm6W5CctmquA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CABbyFmrxYRAf0XBbKa7pguCmJbLCgWW-7oo-R_aB9rPQPL7xzA%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CABbyFmrxYRAf0XBbKa7pguCmJbLCgWW-7oo-R_aB9rPQPL7xzA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.


--
Stuart Clark

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/25165931-3cbd-71dd-7a67-978be54029af%40Jahingo.com.

Reply via email to