Hi David et al,

I'll do the migration of the CVS repo this week-end, then. Hopefully I don't 
run into trouble.

Cheers,
Clément.

On 09/18/2015 05:54 AM, David Aspinall wrote:
> Hi Pierre/all,
> 
> Sorry for delay replying, I was away then returned but now very busy
> with start of term...
> 
> Have made a new Admin team now with you and Clément as members.
> 
> BTW, a mapping of names->emails is in the Makefile somewhere, although
> it may be incomplete  (try "make ChangeLog").
> 
> If we're going to switch to Github properly I'd like to switch off the
> cvs server and then update the webpages, would you be able to help with
> the web page updates too?  There is another repo that I can add to GitHub.
> 
>  - David
> 
> 
> On 14/09/2015 17:00, Pierre Courtieu wrote:
>> Hi pg dev!
>>
>> Trying to wake up this thread 5 months later.
>>
>> Coq-8.5 is not yet released but its beta version is already quite
>> spread and used. IMHO it is the right time for a release of PG.
>>
>> I suggest that Clément performs the migration to github now and that
>> we make a release quickly from git. The best would be an elpa (or
>> melpa) package release + a tarball.
>>
>> David is it ok for you?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Pierre
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-04-28 14:36 GMT+02:00 Clément Pit--Claudel <clement....@gmail.com>:
>>> On 04/28/2015 04:53 AM, David Aspinall wrote:
>>>> Hello Clément,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry I haven't looked in detail yet, hope soon.  Thanks for sending the
>>>> tips of what you did.  I want to try again to get the names right and
>>>> maybe some other minor surgery (looking at reposurgeon for that but
>>>> haven't tried it yet).
>>>
>>> No problem, thanks for the quick response!
>>> cvs2git has a mapping of cvs usernames to git usernames, so it should just 
>>> be a matter of finding the names and emails of each PG developer.
>>>
>>>> I think your suggestion for Trac is sensible.  We might leave it up but
>>>> make it read only, perhaps.
>>>
>>> That sounds great.
>>>
>>>> I've made a team for PG developers on GitHub, Clément you are invited,
>>>> anyone else please let me know your GitHub username.
>>>
>>> Great, thanks!
>>>
>>>>  - David
>>>>
>>>> On 26/04/2015 02:01, Clément Pit--Claudel wrote:
>>>>> Hi David & list,
>>>>>
>>>>> David: Have you had time to look at my attempt to migrate to git? My 
>>>>> username on github is cpitclaudel.
>>>>>
>>>>> List: I had a quick look at options to migrate trac tickets to GitHub. 
>>>>> There seems to exist solutions, but nothing too robust. There hasn't been 
>>>>> loads of activity on trac in the last few years though, so I'm not sure 
>>>>> if such a migration is really needed. And (as opposed to CVS) there is no 
>>>>> need to retire Trac immediately after the migration.
>>>>>
>>>>> Clément.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/20/2015 03:49 PM, David Aspinall wrote:
>>>>>> Hello Clément, all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a very timely message!  I have indeed started to think of making 
>>>>>> this migration again.  Although I don't have a lot of time to work on 
>>>>>> it, I would like to see it done.  There is an old attempt here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  https://github.com/DavidAspinall/ProofGeneral
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but it didn't get updated and indeed we could do a better job with the 
>>>>>> user names.  I'll take a look at your attempt soon (which tool did you 
>>>>>> use?).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree that we probably need to set a cut-off date and disconnect the 
>>>>>> old CVS repo, the sync options don't look robust.  What I could most do 
>>>>>> with help is converting the packaging/publishing tools to use the github 
>>>>>> repo.  (The web pages also badly need replacing but I'm not sure if 
>>>>>> anyone would have the stomach to do that?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm slightly wary of needing to manage merge requests so I thought of 
>>>>>> using a GitHub organisation for this to share the job and to host a 
>>>>>> central repo.  Hence:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  https://github.com/ProofGeneral
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If anyone on this list would like to join, please tell me your GitHub 
>>>>>> user name.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  - David
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20/04/2015 19:29, Clément Pit--Claudel wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Pierre and David (and proofgeneral-devel),
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There were talks a while ago on the mailing list about a migration to 
>>>>>>> git. I think this would be really cool. I experimented with various 
>>>>>>> export options, and came up with the repo at 
>>>>>>> https://github.com/cpitclaudel/proof-general/ . The problem with the 
>>>>>>> process that I used is that it makes it hard to incrementally track 
>>>>>>> changes (we would need to migrate once and for all).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Most of the history seems to have been preserved just fine, but it 
>>>>>>> would be nice to map CVS usernames to proper names and emails; the 
>>>>>>> authors in the CVS tree seem to be [assia, crr, cxl, da, djs, fionam, 
>>>>>>> gklein, hhg, joheras, lego, makarius, mark, markus, monnier, patrl, 
>>>>>>> pier, proofgen, pxc, sberghof, tews, tms, weber]. Is there a list of 
>>>>>>> names and emails somewhere matching these usernames?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It would be great to get feedback on the history as recorded in 
>>>>>>> https://github.com/cpitclaudel/proof-general/ ; also, if a migration 
>>>>>>> was eventually decided, I could help with the process. One reason for 
>>>>>>> migrating to Git and hosting on Github would be lowering the barrier of 
>>>>>>> entry to new contributors: many of the changes that I made in my 
>>>>>>> company-coq plugin could in fact be ported to proof-general. It could 
>>>>>>> also allow for simplified distribution of extensions and updated 
>>>>>>> versions, via emacs' package system.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Clément.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ProofGeneral-devel mailing list
ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel

Reply via email to