Hi all, 

I've got a prototype for a Prosody feature that I want/need. I'm keen to get  
your input on it. 

What I want to do is distribute users for a single domain across multiple  
Prosody instances while having them look like a single server on the  
outside. The reasons for this are partly to do with load - I'm preparing for  
a time where there are thousands of users online - but also to fit neatly  
into our existing infrastructure, where we spread email users across  
multiple servers. I like the idea of mirroring our email architecture and  
doing redundancy the same way. 

Note that I'm expressly not talking about real live clustering, where a  
server can fail and the user remains connected. A Prosody instance (or its  
underlying machine) can fail and the sessions will be disconnected. That's  
totally fine with me - most clients will quietly reconnect without issue. 

It seems that all that's necessary to make this happen is to hook into the  
stanza delivery code. If we have a session for a user on the current server,  
we deliver it to them. If not, we do a lookup (via an external daemon) to  
see where the "home" server for the user is. If we find one, we pass the  
stanza over to that server and let it deliver it. If not, we continue as  

So I have a very rough prototype in this three plugins: 




mod_shard is the shard lookup hook. mod_shard_client and mod_shard_server  
are the bits that pass stanzas between servers. They're not especially  
interesting, and are mostly hacked from mod_component and  

I'm assuming a very controlled environment here - secure networks (no auth  
required between shards), a user->shard lookup daemon, common storage and  
auth and a proxy that can get incoming user connections to the right shard  
(in my case that's nginx-xmpp). I'm expecting s2s to be covered by a par of  
Prosody instances that accept stanzas and pass them to the right shard. I  
should be able to run multiple of those because they're basically stateless. 

So that's the whole description. Hopefully it all made sense! What I'm  
looking for is some feedback on whether the way I've implemented this makes  
sense (half-arsed prototype code notwithstanding) and any thoughts about  
what user-visible differences in XMPP it might present (stanza delivery  
order comes to mind). And any other thoughts you might have! 


Rob N. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"prosody-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to prosody-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to prosody-dev@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prosody-dev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to