On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, at 07:02 PM, Victor Seva wrote:
> Great. I'm was working on that already so maybe we can share ideas. Be
> aware that this work was done several months ago for 0.9.4 and I had
> to stop working on this due to work load.
Sure! I haven't had time to read your code yet, but I will very soon.
Thanks for mentioning it!
>> I'm expecting s2s to be covered by a par of Prosody instances that
>> accept stanzas and pass them to the right shard. I should be able to
>> run multiple of those because they're basically stateless.
> But did you try that?
No, not yet, but it seems to make sense. Do you anticipate a problem
with that approach?
> My approach was to extend mod_s2s as mod_s2sc to connect the nodes:
So you're doing s2s/dialback between nodes? That will work I suppose,
but in my case would be unnecessary overhead (not a lot of overhead,
Do you do outbound s2s from the cluster nodes, or push that through a
central s2s node? I'm thinking I'll have inbound through a central node,
but outbound directly from the shards - much easier to manage.
> So I think we are trying to do the same thing. I have to point that I
> didn't finish to polish this and for sure it could not work as it is
> right now. But you can get the idea.
Of course. I'll have a good read of your code as soon as I possibly can.
Cheers, Rob N.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prosody-dev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.