This issue with CE marking has caused many of us lots of headaches.  Wading
through the standards documents, it becomes clear that they are the work
committees where all the members want to have their say, whether or not it
is of value or not.  How about changing the location of the tattoo to one's
cheek.  Then one can make a statement at each inspection ...

Sorry! It's Friday here in New Zealand...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Cuthbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 10 August 2001 08:15
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Logo's for FCC, UL and CE ?
> 
> 
> "Brad Velander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >        Similarly, one can apply the same logic to resistors,
> >capacitors and other components. Unless there is a specific directive
> >which covers those types of components, they are covered under the
> >products most suitable directives and are the responsibility of the
> >integrator who used the components in their product.
> 
> Hmm... this begs the question:  What about CE markings on the 
> integrator
> him/herself?  Presumably, if an engineer has a CE tattoo on his
> arm/shoulder/etc., this would mean the products he designs are
> CE-compliant, right?
> 
> With tongue firmly in cheek...
> 
> ---
> Dave Cuthbert
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


The contents of this E-mail may contain information that is legally
privileged and/or confidential to the named recipient. This information is
not to be used by any other person and/or organisation. The views expressed
in this document do not necessarily reflect those of the company. 


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*                      - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to