I would concur with exactly what Peter has stated. Do two schematic symbols as close to identical for pin locations as is possible. Quite often on a BGA packaged part, there may be a few additional pins used anyway (additional gnds or pwrs, right)?
Sincerely, Brad Velander. Lead PCB Designer Norsat International Inc. #300 - 4401 Still Creek Drive, Burnaby, B.C., Canada, V5C 6G9. Tel (604) 292-9089 (direct line) Fax (604) 292-9010 Website: www.norsat.com -----Original Message----- From: Peter W. Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:11 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] schematic lib ? I'd bite the bullet and do this the obvious, hard way: make a standard-numbered BGA footprint (A1,A2...) which you can reuse someday for a different part in the same package, then make 2 schematic symbols, one for each pkg. I'd at least put corresponding pins in the same locs on the 2 symbols so they can be easily 'swapped' in the schematic if necessary... good luck -- Peter W. Richards / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Design Engineer Reflectivity, Inc. ph 408 970 8881 x113 fx 408 970 8840 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
