At 01:19 PM 2/13/2002 +1100, Darren Moore wrote:
> > According to the file dates on my old high density 5 1/4"
> > disks - Tango version 1.13 was October 89, version 1.14
> > was December 89, (a bunch more updates we'll ignore) and
> > Tango version 2.0 was December 90.
>
>The earliest copy on disk I can find is:
>[...] Autotrax 1.10 TRAXEDIT.EXE Size 163K Date 12 Jan 1989

So it looks like the idea that Tango II was written because Accel got tired 
of waiting for Autotrax doesn't fly, Autotrax was out for a year before 
Tango II.

 From the other descriptions, I'd infer that Accel made the decision to 
roll their own; this explains why bug fixes and the upgrade took so long. 
There were no more bug fixes for Tango I because Protel had already issued 
Autotrax.

There were some really good people at Accel, but I did not have that 
feeling about the man at the top.... Apparently I'm not the only one to 
have reservations about Accel's leadership up until it was bought by Protel.


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Abdulrahman Lomax
Easthampton, Massachusetts USA


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to