Tim

Instead of using fills go to your design rules, manufacturing, Polygon
connect style.

Set up a new rule for component, VS???, Direct Connect.

This should give you a complete pour over the pads.

Ian Capps
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Fifield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Virtual Short


> I think I figured it out. What I did was just create a clearance rule for
> those two specific net names for the 2 pads. Then I just connected the
pour
> with copper fills. It's not real pretty but I think it will work.
>
> Thanks Ian for your help.
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Fifield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 3:05 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Virtual Short
>
>
> Ian,
>
> How do I go about doing this? I've created a sch component and a foot
print
> with two pads 0.01mm apart. The pads have the same net names as the
polygon
> pours. When I place the footprint where I want the neck the polygons just
> pour around the 2 pads.
>
> How do I name the 2 pads something different so the 2 polygons will be
able
> to connect?
>
> Tim
>
> >Or you could position two rectangular pads close together, giving them
> >suitable names.  Then you can restrict the micro-clearance to just these
> >named pads.  Then track your neck in and out of these pads as you wish.
>
>
>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to