On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:51 PM, joel falcou <[email protected]> wrote: > So, Thomas and I felt bored or some suhc this afternoon. Incidentally, I > needed to use Boost::Parameters > in NT² but found the compile time to be somehow slow. > So in a flash of defiance, we went to reimplementing a subset of parameters > using proto
So you implemented something significantly slower (3 times on machine with gcc4.3). Not very surprising; adding complex abstraction in the implementation rarely makes things faster. Here's the Boost.Parameter version, for reference: http://gist.github.com/525778 -- Daniel Wallin BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ proto mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
