On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:51 PM, joel falcou <joel.fal...@lri.fr> wrote:
> So, Thomas and I felt bored or some suhc this afternoon. Incidentally, I
> needed to use Boost::Parameters
> in NT² but found the compile time to be somehow slow.
> So in a flash of defiance, we went to reimplementing a subset of parameters
> using proto
So you implemented something significantly slower (3 times on machine
with gcc4.3). Not very surprising; adding complex abstraction in the
implementation rarely makes things faster.
Here's the Boost.Parameter version, for reference:
proto mailing list