On Monday 02 March 2009, Adewale Oshineye wrote: > This article has some surprising results from it's performance > comparison of Thrift, Protocol Buffers and JSON: > http://bouncybouncy.net/ramblings/posts/thrift_and_protocol_buffers/
The outcome looks about right. In the latest version of Python, even simplejson has C extensions. A one order of magnitude difference between a pure Python versus C implementation is about right, if not too small. I would have expected a difference of 20-50 times. Besides the fact that this post is is far too short on details - i.e. Python version, OS, hardware -- I would look at it as a great motivation to get the C extensions for PB done quickly. ;-) Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter Web Software Design, Development and Training Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
