Oops. … all BSD _licenses are_… On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Gregory Kick <g...@google.com> wrote: > Also, note that all BSD is not created equal. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses Protobuf itself is licensed > under the "New" BSD license, so you might want to clarify which > version he means. > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Marco Tedone <marco.ted...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have already talked to dtrott and he confirmed his plugin runs under the >> BSD license. Time allowing I will attempt to contact him and suggest an >> official release. In the meantime I'm releasing version 0.0.2.RELEASE of my >> one. >> >> Regards, >> >> Marco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gregory Kick [mailto:g...@google.com] >> Sent: 21 June 2011 19:28 >> To: Marco Tedone >> Cc: Pherl Liu; Protocol Buffers >> Subject: Re: [protobuf] Uploading the maven-protoc-plugin to Maven Central? >> >> I can't seem to find anything about licenses in that code and IANAL anyway. >> That said, much of that code is derived from my original code, which was >> under the same license as protobuf anyway. Might be worth emailing him to >> make sure that the licensing is what you think it is. >> >> Anyway, I definitely support a community effort to build a better plugin. >> I'd suggest reaching out to dtrott and discussing collaboration and if you >> guys want to work on making some version of either plugin "official" then we >> can get CLAs for you guys and do that. >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Marco Tedone <marco.ted...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> So, the google maven-protoc plugin has been retired in favour of dtrott >>> one. I had a look at dtrott plugin and it seems to me unnecessary >>> convoluted. Additionally it runs under the BSD license, which is not very >>> Enterprise Friendly. >>> >>> I created my own, which is just a wrapper around protoc and runs under >>> the MIT license *and* is on Maven central: >>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/uk/co/jemos/maven/plugins/maven-jemosPro >>> toc-plugin/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Marco >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Gregory Kick [mailto:g...@google.com] >>> Sent: 21 June 2011 18:26 >>> To: Pherl Liu >>> Cc: Marco Tedone; Protocol Buffers >>> Subject: Re: [protobuf] Uploading the maven-protoc-plugin to Maven Central? >>> >>> See http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81#c20 >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Pherl Liu <liuj...@google.com> wrote: >>>> +Gregory >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Marco Tedone >>>> <marco.ted...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Is there a reason why the plugin hasn't been uploaded to Maven >>>>> Central? If you want I could take ownership of that but then I'd >>>>> have to be the owner of the com.google.protobuf Maven groupId, which >>>>> I don't think is a good idea. >>>>> >>>>> There are already two other maven-protoc-plugin out there, both >>>>> custom and this is causing confusion. I believe people would like to >>>>> see the "Google" maven-protoc-plugin and use that, but in a way is >>>>> easy to use (e.g. available in Maven Central). >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Greg Kick >>> Data Liberation >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Greg Kick >> Data Liberation >> >> > > > > -- > Greg Kick > Data Liberation >
-- Greg Kick Data Liberation -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.