That was a little bit more vague than I would have liked. They did work, they just didn't work with the Azure Service Bus, which is my end goal.
-Jimmy -----Original Message----- From: Jimmy Campbell [mailto:t-jic...@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 9:42 AM To: proton@qpid.apache.org Subject: RE: Proton-c on android I started out using Proton-J 0.7 on windows 8.1 and then I tried it with 0.6 on linux CentOS. Neither of them worked for me. -Jimmy -----Original Message----- From: Rafael Schloming [mailto:r...@alum.mit.edu] Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 8:32 AM To: proton@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: Proton-c on android Can you provide me with the details of what version of proton-j you were using and what kind of environment? --Rafael On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jimmy Campbell <t-jic...@microsoft.com> wrote: > I was unable to get messages through to the Azure Service Bus. It kept > saying "remote host has dropped the connection" in system error. > > Proton-c is able to send without any issues. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rafael Schloming [mailto:r...@alum.mit.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 8:26 AM > To: proton@qpid.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proton-c on android > > What sort of problems did you run into with proton-j? > > --Rafael > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Jimmy Campbell > <t-jic...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > Proton-j was my first choice but I was unable to connect to the > > Azure Service Bus, which is my end goal. There are tutorials and > > support for connecting proton-c to the azure service bus. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Clebert Suconic [mailto:csuco...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 7:00 PM > > To: proton@qpid.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Proton-c on android > > > > Wouldn't Proton-j be a better fit? > > > > > > On May 28, 2014, at 8:45 PM, Jimmy Campbell <t-jic...@microsoft.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I am trying to get proton-c to run on android. Does anybody have > > > any > > advice or experience on the matter that I can get in contact with? > > > > >
