Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/48#discussion_r36181543
--- Diff:
proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/engine/impl/EventImpl.java ---
@@ -68,12 +69,19 @@ void clear()
}
@Override
- public Type getType()
+ public EventType getEventType()
{
return type;
}
@Override
+ public Type getType() {
+ if (type instanceof Type)
--- End diff --
I'd be more inclined to drop the Reactor events from the Type given that
there are currently no users of those events yet (its never been released),
whereas the others have been part of the main API for using the engine for
quite some time and changing them would definitely hurt a bunch of folks. That
said, my comment wasn't really about anything like that, just noting a dislike
of needing to do the instanceof but also recognising why :)
I'm not sure about using 'Egnine'. I did actually think of that name
earlier and decided agaisnt suggesting it. I'd say the older events are 'more
core' in some ways than the new reactor ones, with the reactor being built on
top of the eingine...but I guess also has IO related events that dont. Having
both 'engine' and 'reactor' events named Core right now seems nicer in some
ways than having the reactor events named 'Engine' events. I dunno. Mainly I
just disliked 'Builtin' :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
