-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Dupont wrote: > You act as if the web isn't built upon conventions, even arbitrary ones. No idea how you got to this conclusion.
> I think this is a POLS issue, only we disagree on which behavior is least > surprising. But since Prototype is designed to go hand-in-hand with > Rails, and since JavaScript methods can be redefined at runtime, I think > the empty brackets convention is the way to go here. And this is really amazing, as it contradicts with what I heard about Prototype (as not being tied with Rails). I liked that, and tried to defend that. OFC, I may have heard it wrong, as I'm reading/using Prototype for just about a couple of days, so you all have my apologies for this misunderstanding. > If you disagree (or if whatever server framework you use disagrees), you > can monkeypatch in your own serialization logic. It's not about one "server framework" or another, but merely about my yet another mistake to presume your were discussing about creating an application/x-www-form-urlencoded compatible serialization engine. Anyway, hopefully no real harm done for you - besides Collin's headache -, I'll keep quiet from now on, as I'm not currently interested in Rails. Thank you all very much for supporting me and my deepest apologies for all my mistakes. Prototype was a great experience thanks to all of you. Best regards. - -- Marius Feraru -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFF+db6tZHp/AYZiNkRAmCyAJ9jQXTdADmCHNsygN+9kmTTb5g6jACgoMoW fI+TE8VAX2r3ItKN/Cg2hzI= =lEJO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
