Hi Justin
I'm not 100% sure about that, but after a quick look at prototype
source code, I would recommend you the following solution:
1. change the DIV (child of FORM) into FIELDSET (better semantics)
2. use Form.serialize(YOUR_FIELDSET)
And the general solution for prototype could be extending the
fieldsets with the methods like serialize() :)
Greetings :)
On 17 Kwi, 08:42, mr_justin <gro...@jperkins.otherinbox.com> wrote:
> Joran, that is too funny man. Please re-read my question and then your
> response. ;)
>
> Let me explain a bit more, so the idea is clear.
>
> I have a form with a bunch of form controls in it (say it ain't so!).
> Within that form is a DIV that has even more form controls in it. For
> the sake of simplicity, let's say all the form controls outside of the
> DIV are for one record, and all the form controls inside the DIV are
> for a different record.
>
> I think it would be darn handy to be able to do this: $('my-
> form').serialize({within:'my-div'});
>
> With the whole nested forms stuff in Rails 2.3, I thought this topic
> might have come up already. It would be cool to make the serialization
> logic more flexible (pluggable, as you say Andrew). As it is now, it's
> an all or nothing, my way or the highway kind of approach. Which
> honestly is fine 99% of the time. And when it's not, there's things
> like Simon's snippet can meet those wacky esoteric needs.
>
> -justin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
