Agreed. :) Best,
Tobie On Oct 22, 9:34 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > ...without core support (or at least > > mention of resources like this from the core prototype site) people > > won't find these resources... > > Oh, I don't know. Try googling "prototype tip" or "prototype tips", > for instance. ;-) And that's after about a week. Give us some time, > and I figure we'll show up even without Core links, and on more likely > searches. (Who searches for "prototype tip"? :-) ) > > That said, I don't have any reason to believe that the Core folks have > a problem with the unofficial wiki and in fact I *do* have reason to > believe that if we do a good job with it, they'll happily link to it. > "Unofficial" doesn't mean unuseful and unappreciated. Just that the > information doesn't have to be cleared through committee before > appearing on the wiki. > > I think we completely agree about community and bringing together > plugins and add-ons, though, and from some recent conversations (not > to mention Andrew's recent blog posts), I think that the Core folks > are with us on that as well and that we'll be seeing efforts from them > on that front. > -- > T.J. Crowder > tj / crowder software / com > > On Oct 22, 7:07 pm, Andrew Kaspick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A little late to this thread and maybe I missed something somewhere, > > so please ignore me if I have, but without core support (or at least > > mention of resources like this from the core prototype site) people > > won't find these resources. It took me long enough to find scripteka > > back in the day because there was no "official" recognition of it. If > > core doesn't start linking to these sites or at least make them easier > > to find, they'll all fall by the side eventually along with > > prototype. So collaboration with core I see as being a must at this > > point for both parties involved. > > > Prototype is useful for what it does, but plugins/widgets built on top > > of prototype make it even more useful, but if people don't see them, > > off they go to another javascript lib. > > > Saying that, so far the wiki looks good. > > > On Oct 8, 8:15 am, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Heya, > > > > > Given the recent blog post from the prototype core, is this wiki going > > > > to be endorsed by the core? > > > > You never know. I actually hadn't seen Andrew's post before setting > > > it up; we were both probably responding to the same issues. > > > > I suspect it'll totally depend on what their own plans are, and > > > whether they like what they see on the unofficial wiki. I don't know > > > that "endorsement" is necessary, although if they like it and don't > > > want to do their own, a link in the fullness of time would probably > > > good. > > > > > ...and I fear that unless you get core support, it will falter > > > > and die. > > > > I don't think it will, not unless they were actively *opposed* to a > > > community-run wiki -- now that would be a problem (not least because I > > > don't want to piss people off). :-) But I don't see that. If we (all > > > of us) run a good site with good content, that's just one less thing > > > for them to worry about. > > > > What would make it falter and die would be if people didn't post > > > content. > > > -- > > > T.J. Crowder > > > tj / crowder software / com > > > > On Oct 8, 1:56 pm, puckpuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Given the recent blog post from the prototype core, is this wiki going > > > > to be endorsed by the core? > > > > > We don't need them specifically to be controlling it, as the whole > > > > notion of a wiki is community contribution, but this is very long > > > > overdue, and I fear that unless you get core support, it will falter > > > > and die. > > > > > PS:... "finally" > > > > > On Oct 8, 4:07 am, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jan, > > > > > > Doh! Fixed now. The wiki was still marked private, and so the system > > > > > wasn't letting you go to the second page. (It's not meant to require > > > > > membership just for *viewing*.) > > > > > > Fixed now, sorry for the hassle! > > > > > -- > > > > > T.J. Crowder > > > > > tj / crowder software / com > > > > > > On Oct 8, 8:22 am, Jan Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > The site says: > > > > > > > Click the link below to get the "application" box > > > > > > > - no application box for me... just that link I can click on as many > > > > > > times as I want while nothing happens. > > > > > > > /Jan > > > > > > > On 07-10-2008 16:11, T.J. Crowder wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > In a few threads recently[1][2][3], there's been discussion of > > > > > > > having > > > > > > > a community-run, unofficial site for Prototype & script.aculo.us > > > > > > > content. I've created the very, very bare bones here: > > > > > > > >http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/ > > > > > > > > Obviously there's essentially no content yet. :-) I figure it'll > > > > > > > probably grow slowly over time. > > > > > > > > Enjoy! > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > T.J. Crowder > > > > > > > tj / crowder software / com > > > > > > > > [1]http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous/browse_thread/... > > > > > > > [2]http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous/browse_thread/... > > > > > > > [3]http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous/browse_thread/... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
