Hi Nich, Thanks for your answer! Could you elaborate a bit on the section:
/"My largest reason for preferring Protoype though is that it gives you the tools you need to write your own javascript classes and extend the DOM simply and easily without the hassle web browsers"/ Isn't that possible with jQuery? (reveals my level of knowledge of jQuery, doesn't it?) A quick example ? /Jan On 20-01-2009 13:06, Nicholas Steicke wrote: > Jan Hansen wrote <snip>: > >> *What is - in your opinion - the main argument for using prototype in >> favour of jQuery?* >> >> - please, no "I like it better"-answers. Heck, even *I* like prototype >> better myself for some reason. And I've never really worked with >> jQuery. But I need arguments. Facts. Benchmarks. Comparisons. >> >> So, what say ya? >> > I have worked with both Prototype and jQuery and I must say I very much > prefer Prototype as the way it dose things seam much more intuitive to > me than the way jQuery dose. > I also fine the Prototype and Scriptaculous documentation easier to read > and use. > > My largest reason for preferring Protoype though is that it gives you > the tools you need to write your own javascript classes and extend the > DOM simply and easily without the hassle web browsers. > > Nich > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
