On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 22:41, Jan Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Nich,
>
> Thanks for your answer! Could you elaborate a bit on the section:
>
> *"My largest reason for preferring Protoype though is that it gives you
> the tools you need to write your own javascript classes and extend the
> DOM simply and easily without the hassle web browsers"*
>
> Isn't that possible with jQuery? (reveals my level of knowledge of jQuery,
> doesn't it?) A quick example ?
>
> /Jan
>

>From my time working with jQuery I couldn't find anything like Prototype's
Class.create() - which is a very simple method of writing your own
JavaScript classes that will work across all browsers. Prototype also makes
handling class inheritance very easy. As is mentioned elsewhere in this
conversation, jQuery seams to be more about selectors than it dose about
making writing JavaScript applications easy.

Nich

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to