On Mar 11, 7:38 pm, Robert Kieffer <bro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, it's a nice little trick. And, yes, it does look a little
> fishy, but I couldn't think of any reason why it wouldn't work.
For it not to work you would need the two following conditions:
1. Function.prototype.apply passing it's second argument directly to
the function object instead of using it to repopulate a new arguments
object (as per specs), and
2. the length property of array object to loose it's magical behaviour
(which, when set, deletes arguments >= to it).
Such an implementation would have a lot more issues than breaking your
implementation of Function.prototype.bind.
I'm therefore completely in favor of rewriting the whole of
function.js taking this into account.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
