Has that been tested with deferral?

Ryan Gahl
Nth Penguin, LLC
Inquire: 1-920-574-2218
Blog: http://www.someElement.com
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryangahl

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Tobie Langel <tobie.lan...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Actually, Robert, I took a closer look at your implementation.
> And I figured out why it's so much faster.
> You're relying on a single array of partially applied arguments whose
> length you reset rather than cloning the array each time.
> This actually turns out to be perfectly spec-compliant and avoids
> significant memory consumption (one arg array instantiation upon
> binding instead of one per call to the bound function).
> I must admit this looks both very appealing... and scary at the same
> time.
> Thoughts anyone ?
> Best,
> Tobie
> >

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to