On Jun 15, 3:48 am, "T.J. Crowder" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Heya,
>
> > I thought it wouldn't come as a surprise that using XHTML makes no
> > sense...
>
> Hey, HTML and CSS make no sense, let alone XHTML. But that's OT. :-)
> I'm just saying, the doctype that seems to be recommended is XHTML
> transitional, so that's what I use as I don't have a strong reason for
I would certainly not recommend any type of XHTML doctype (when
designing apps for general web). I don't see a reason for Prototype to
recommend or encourage it either. As I said, there's no point in using
xhtml 99% of the time (for the reasons described well in that
article). That's pretty much all I'm saying ;)
[...]
--
kangax
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
